I was after a better walk around lens for my canon R7 as my sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 OSS HSM is not native to the R mount system. I noticed on the
mpb website a canon efs 17-55 IS UMS which should perform like a native RF lens on the EF-RF adapter.
I traded my sigma in as like new ( because it is very, very clean and no marks ) and I was quoted a price ‘As New’.
When
mpb received my lens I was notified it had a scratch on the inner rear lens, and therefore a lower price was tendered 13% lower !
I did ask fr a picture and was sent a photo od the rear lens. The so called scratch was not visible to the human eye.
I agreed and waited the EF-s to arrived and when it did it had an error code fault.
I returned the said lens and asked for my sigma to be returned, and to unwind the deal. However Mpb sales informed me I would have to buy back my lens at the full retail price on the website, as per their T&C’s and policy on used lens purchased. ! ! ! WTF !
I did buy back my own lens at full retail price on the mpb website, which was a lot more than my trade in value, minus a £10 voucher sales offered as a good will, thanks mpb
In all I paid over £70apx in all just to get my lens back from mpb !
What is the morale of this story, well never trade in your lens until you try and test the new lens from mpb.
Take lots of pictures of your trade in lens. As I had taken pictures of my sigma lens before I dispatched it and check it when it got back. I could not find the said scratch mpb informed me was on the rear lens.
I even used my 100mm L f2.8 macro lens and all I could see was micro fiber and dust from my cleaning clothe. I cleaned the rear lens it again, and small fibers where just in a different place on the rear lens.
I believe the said scratch was a fiber on the lens and at some angels it may look like a sratch ( I am trying to give mpb the benefit of the doubt )
Read up on the Distance Selling Act to make sure you know your rights.
I would like to mention that Rosie at mpb was a absolute star and helped me get my original lens back before someone could buy it on the website. With out her input I may have not managed to re-purchase my own lens back !
I had used mpb about 5 years ago to purchase a EVF for my NEX5R which I thought was a little over priced. What I was not impressed with at the time was a practically high P&P charged. Which made my purchase some what expensive !
Sorry for the essay !