Dale.
Bo Derek
- Messages
- 14,150
- Name
- Dale.
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I may have found one, an EF lens that doesn't behave well on an R body and it's a Canon lens too.
The lens in question is the 300f4L IS USM. 90's tech admittedly but I didn't expect it to be clunky as heck on my R7. It's a lens I've owned from new but it's lived most of its life in its case in my gear cupboard, it's like new cosmetically. A bit of a shame the lack of use it's had but that's another story.
I wanted to try it on the R7 as it's a decent aperture and would give me 480mm equivalent on that body, which would be an improvement over the 400 5.6 I currently have.
It wasn't great at all on the R7, I was worried but I tried it today on my 5Div and it's like butter, so it's not the lens. My theory is, the in lens stabilisation is clashing with the IBIS on the body.
This is the first issue I've experienced when adapting EF glass to an RF body, my other lenses are seamless.
Has anybody else had problems with Canon EF glass adapted to an R body?
The lens in question is the 300f4L IS USM. 90's tech admittedly but I didn't expect it to be clunky as heck on my R7. It's a lens I've owned from new but it's lived most of its life in its case in my gear cupboard, it's like new cosmetically. A bit of a shame the lack of use it's had but that's another story.
I wanted to try it on the R7 as it's a decent aperture and would give me 480mm equivalent on that body, which would be an improvement over the 400 5.6 I currently have.
It wasn't great at all on the R7, I was worried but I tried it today on my 5Div and it's like butter, so it's not the lens. My theory is, the in lens stabilisation is clashing with the IBIS on the body.
This is the first issue I've experienced when adapting EF glass to an RF body, my other lenses are seamless.
Has anybody else had problems with Canon EF glass adapted to an R body?