my ideal lens

A

andyt70

Messages
216
Name
AndyT
Edit My Images
Yes
would be a 18mm-250/300mm macro AF with VR/OS/IS for £99
however... i know that doesnt exist

so what in all your combined wisdom and experience would be a suitable real life alternative
basically i usually shoot landscapes, but occasionally will want to do a bit of macro / v close up but not technically macro work plus some zoom, high end zoom will most likely be on a tripod so is VR needed?

cheers
 
Not sure what your budget is but on the end of my D80 you'll either find the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 or the Nikkor 18-200VR. VR & tripods don't mix well but you can turn it off. Hope that helps? If you can define a budget you may get more specific suggestions...
 
i think my ideal lens would be a 10-600mm f1.4 and still weighed under 1kg and cost £100 and as sharp through out the rage as a prime lens!, but now im just dreaming.

may dad has a sigma 28-300, macro ( at the longest end) doesnt get the best reviews but the results seem quite good.
 
When I bought my 350D, I got the Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 zoom. It's something of a jack-of-all-trades, and therefore of course a mater of none, but for the price (around £200 these days) it really is very useful. There's also now an optically stabilised version for I think around £250.

It's pretty good at the wide-to-medium focal lengths. For example here are a couple of panos I shot with it in the Lakes. If you click on them you can see larger versions, and the amount of detail is quite decent.

f=18mm

Click on the image to see a larger version (1750x800px, 541kB) in my SmugMug gallery.

f=40mm

Click on the image to see a larger version (3000x785px, 902kB) in my SmugMug gallery.

And here's one of about 1,000,000 portraits of my cat, taken at a medium focal length. It isn't anything special by itself, but when you look at the 100% crop below it you'll see that it's really quite surprisingly and satisfactorily sharp.

f=72mm
147263993-M.jpg


f=72mm, 100% crop
147264022-O.jpg


However it doesn't seem to be as sharp as this at full zoom (200mm). In addition, it's not a "proper" macro lens - though it will focus down to about 45cm which is good for moderate close-ups.

All in all I'm very pleased with it.
 
wow cant fault those shots i sometime wonder if reviews suggesting some of these jack of all trades lenses are not up to the job are just being a bit too fussy :)
as for budget ... i'd be willing to wait to save for say 400 ish, but would prefer much lower :)
 
andyt70 said:
wow cant fault those shots i sometime wonder if reviews suggesting some of these jack of all trades lenses are not up to the job are just being a bit too fussy :)
Click to expand...
Thanks Andy. To be honest, recently I've found myself a bit disappointed with the Sigma 18-200 at the long end of its zoom. That's probably because I've been trying to photograph some of the more unusual birds we get in our garden - for example this one - and it's really not up to the job. It's a bit soft, and of course a maximum aperture of f/6.3 isn't much use unless you've got bright light. No complaints with the lens generally, as you'll have gathered, but I guess it's not quite the jack of all trades.

So I'm thinking of replacing it with something like a Sigma 17-70 or a Canon 17-85 IS, both of which have great reputations for image quality and would make good walkaround lenses, plus a 70-200 or 70-300 or something like that.

Or on the other hand I might well keep it for those (frequent) occasions when I just want to carry a camera with me and not worry too much about the technicalities, and of course it's fine at the short-to-medium focal lengths. Then I might pick up a 70-200 or 70-300 or 100-300 or even 100-400 to cater for when I want a long reach. But all that costs money. Decisions, decisions....
 
Very nice shots Stewart (y) My main walkaround lens this year has been the similar Tamron 18-200mm (now for sale :)), and although I was pretty pleased with it, I've recently upgraded to the Sigma 17-70 - and it is a step up in sharpness from the Tamron, I must say. You won't be disappointed if you upgrade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top