My Type R - HDR
- Thread starter millemg
- Start date
Yes, the sky moved a bit 
- Messages
- 1,402
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
One of the least HDR HDRs I've ever seen. So much so that I don't get it (and I won't get started on the whole driveway/ cement mixer thing you've got going on).
To make the effort of HDR worthwhile I'd expect to see much more detail in the shadow - places like lower front grille and tyre treads. As it is I just see emphasised reflections in the car's side. You've tried to take the whole rest of the image to mono but there's patches like the eaves frontage and the drive either side of the car where strange tones seem to be seeping in.
On the plus side - the car's nice and sharp.
To make the effort of HDR worthwhile I'd expect to see much more detail in the shadow - places like lower front grille and tyre treads. As it is I just see emphasised reflections in the car's side. You've tried to take the whole rest of the image to mono but there's patches like the eaves frontage and the drive either side of the car where strange tones seem to be seeping in.
On the plus side - the car's nice and sharp.
OP
- Messages
- 92
- Name
- Martin
- Edit My Images
- No
OP
- Messages
- 92
- Name
- Martin
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 1,228
- Name
- Keith
- Edit My Images
- No
I'll be honest.
The two pictures dont look like they have been taken by the same person..
The first one looks like its been taken by an amature just starting out, the second looks like a pro shot, all apart from the high amount of noise in the sky, but the colours and the setup is awesome.
The two pictures dont look like they have been taken by the same person..
The first one looks like its been taken by an amature just starting out, the second looks like a pro shot, all apart from the high amount of noise in the sky, but the colours and the setup is awesome.
OP
- Messages
- 92
- Name
- Martin
- Edit My Images
- No
- Messages
- 1,228
- Name
- Keith
- Edit My Images
- No
3 is even better.
Much prefer the angle of #2
