- Messages
- 3,093
- Name
- Russ
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Sorry to raise another thread on this, I've taken on board responses that I had when I posted this question up a few months ago, as well as trying to soak up as much info from the forums and consciously evaluating the sort of photography I do.
At this point in time the body at the top of my short list is the Canon 60D (as an upgrade from my 400D).
Whilst the 550D is well worthy consideration, I think the extra for the 60D would make it a better purchase in the long term and as much as I'd love the 7D, I still couldn't justify the £1000+ price tag.
From a lens perspective, I know my current sigma 18mm-200mm isn't really going to cut it on that (or any) body over 10MP.
I completely understand that in the sub £1000 bracket, having zoom functionality compromises on IQ but given that I take shots of anything that does or doesn't move, I couldn't live with primes.
I'm torn between getting one of Sigma or Tamron's new "superzooms" (18-250/270) or whether my current sigma "would do" for general shots where I'm not going to be pixel peeping too much and a smaller zoom (17-50/80 canon/sigma/Tamron) inconjunction with my Canon 50mm 1.8 would be used for when IQ is higher up on the agenda?
I know ultimately the superzooms are a little hit & miss across their focal range according to what's written on DP Review but surely given my current sigma is 3 years old, the new offerings should be an improvement?
So to summerise, I'm looking to pair a Canon 60D with:
A) Sigma/Tamron 18mm-250/270mm and Canon 50mm f1.8 (with the possibility of adding another prime or smaller zoom in the future)
B) Canon/Sigma/Tamron 17-50/80mm, Canon 50mm f1.8 and a sigma 18mm-200mm when shooting for fun
At this point in time the body at the top of my short list is the Canon 60D (as an upgrade from my 400D).
Whilst the 550D is well worthy consideration, I think the extra for the 60D would make it a better purchase in the long term and as much as I'd love the 7D, I still couldn't justify the £1000+ price tag.
From a lens perspective, I know my current sigma 18mm-200mm isn't really going to cut it on that (or any) body over 10MP.
I completely understand that in the sub £1000 bracket, having zoom functionality compromises on IQ but given that I take shots of anything that does or doesn't move, I couldn't live with primes.
I'm torn between getting one of Sigma or Tamron's new "superzooms" (18-250/270) or whether my current sigma "would do" for general shots where I'm not going to be pixel peeping too much and a smaller zoom (17-50/80 canon/sigma/Tamron) inconjunction with my Canon 50mm 1.8 would be used for when IQ is higher up on the agenda?
I know ultimately the superzooms are a little hit & miss across their focal range according to what's written on DP Review but surely given my current sigma is 3 years old, the new offerings should be an improvement?
So to summerise, I'm looking to pair a Canon 60D with:
A) Sigma/Tamron 18mm-250/270mm and Canon 50mm f1.8 (with the possibility of adding another prime or smaller zoom in the future)
B) Canon/Sigma/Tamron 17-50/80mm, Canon 50mm f1.8 and a sigma 18mm-200mm when shooting for fun
