Significantly NO 24-70 IS. Much expected by sadly a no show - at least so far.
Graham
why significantly?
why significantly?
Because it was seen as a dead cert. One was even claimed to have been sighted.
Perhaps it's been delayed if it's actually going to see the light of day.
Graham
Canon US site describes performance as 'stella'.
15-85 looks like a perfect walkabout.
100L macro is going to be mega, and the trick new IS interesting. But I can't help thinking that macro is the only time when I don't want either AF or IS. Doesn't everyone do serious macro with manual focus and flash? I'd rather stick with the old 100 2.8 macro at half the price, which isn't exactly soft is it.
They are doing a MKII version of the 70-200mm f2.8 IS as well right?
Andy S