I had the 14-24, sold it and got the 16-35 instead, plus a Sigma 12-24 just because. The main issue with the 14-24 is that giant bulbous front element... flare/bloom/ghosting and difficult/expensive to use with ND/CPL.
Does not take screw in filters and is heavy / expensive.
Bit of a specialty lens for very wide photography.
17-35 more useful and practical in my view.
Cant comment on anything else since don't own them, I just use a 35mm prime these days
I personally went for the tokina 16-28 2.8 pro
Like the 14-24 though filters are not cheap due to the front element.
I ended up with the wondapana filter adapter.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.