Probably going to be an optical tour-de-force but I just do not get the point of this over say a 24mmf1.4. Just crop !
Strange focal length
Isn't there also a rumour for a 24-70 2.8 IS ART?
After having my 35 ART a while now and loving it, it's a new 85mm I want them to bring out in the same range.
I had noticed their current 85mm is quite new. To be honest there's loads of rumours about for new lenses that people "want" as opposed to what's actually coming out so I'm more than happy to sit back and wait.Their current 85 is superb and quite new so I think they'll find it difficult to top, they also have other priorities from what I've read.
Yup, the 24 and 35 Art lenses are only 660g and a stop quicker.The lens is 940g!
The lens is 940g!
Anyone got a copy of this yet? Some review online but not many, I think its a bit too big and will stick to my 35.
Let us all know what you think!I have ordered one hasn't arrived yet though hopefully here tomorrow.
I've no clue if it's in development, but if a 24-70 f2.8 is close to 1kg, an f2 version is sure to be an unweildy beast for little gain (in my opinion).As someone else said above, with the roll that Sigma are currently on with their art lenses, it will be great if they do a 24-70 F2 or F2.8 art version. If its as good as the others it'll be stellar !
You might need to consider changing your forum name to f2I have ordered one hasn't arrived yet though hopefully here tomorrow.

Any indication as to pricing on this lens yet ?
Yikes , that's a pricey piece of glass. I think the OP may be onto something buy a quality wide prime and crop.There you go, seems the same price for Canon mount > http://www.ukdigital.co.uk/sigma-24...s-nikon.html?gclid=CIjpybnKxscCFQ4SGwodvRgIvA
If recent Sigma efforts are to go by this will probably be a great lens in optical terms. I just do not see the point in it ? Given the high pixel count in most cameras nowadays why not just get a fast wide prime and crop a bit or take a step or two forwards or backwards in some instances ?