- Messages
- 587
- Name
- Bob
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I have just read Bjørn Rørslett's review of the MkI Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 and was surprised by his views on its performance on FX. Is there anyone out there who can tell us if the MkII is any better, please?
Nikon 70 - 200 mm f/2.8
- Thread starter PickleB
- Start date
That review says it's an excellent lens - what's the problem?
The main difference between the VR MkI and MkII is the improved VR performance and the addresing of the vignetting-issue on FX cameras which TBH isn't that much of a drama - I have a MkI and it's not that noticable (though I tend to add vignetting to a lot of my images anyway, so maybe it's personal preference).
I certainly won't be replacing the one I have for the newer model anytime soon.
The main difference between the VR MkI and MkII is the improved VR performance and the addresing of the vignetting-issue on FX cameras which TBH isn't that much of a drama - I have a MkI and it's not that noticable (though I tend to add vignetting to a lot of my images anyway, so maybe it's personal preference).
I certainly won't be replacing the one I have for the newer model anytime soon.
OP
- Messages
- 587
- Name
- Bob
- Edit My Images
- Yes
No problem, just interested to find out more about the MkII. I won't be getting rid of my MkI either ...
