- Messages
- 76
- Name
- Craig
- Edit My Images
- No
Hello,
I picked up a second hand Sigma 70-200 2.8 (i think this is the fist one they did) a while back but have never really been happy with the results I get, I find even on just cloudy days its still not any better than my cheap 70-300. I Find that i have to bin nearly 50% of what i take and still im not fully happy with the ones I keep.
I have tried to Fine tune the lens on a test chart also with little to no improvment.
Im now getting ready to dig deep and splash out on maybe a nikon version, Im temted to try and hire one but this is proving more difficult as im never home to reccive the delivery.
Is the Nikon VR 1/2 in a differnt league to my old Sigma ?
Will be used on my D300s , mostly Feild hockey some football and rugby Some road cycling events.
Here is a Link to some taken with the sigma http://craigsmithphoto.zenfolio.com/p813682237
If any one has any exp in this please let me know.
Thanks
I picked up a second hand Sigma 70-200 2.8 (i think this is the fist one they did) a while back but have never really been happy with the results I get, I find even on just cloudy days its still not any better than my cheap 70-300. I Find that i have to bin nearly 50% of what i take and still im not fully happy with the ones I keep.
I have tried to Fine tune the lens on a test chart also with little to no improvment.
Im now getting ready to dig deep and splash out on maybe a nikon version, Im temted to try and hire one but this is proving more difficult as im never home to reccive the delivery.
Is the Nikon VR 1/2 in a differnt league to my old Sigma ?
Will be used on my D300s , mostly Feild hockey some football and rugby Some road cycling events.
Here is a Link to some taken with the sigma http://craigsmithphoto.zenfolio.com/p813682237
If any one has any exp in this please let me know.
Thanks