Nikon AF-S Macro (Micro) lens

[waspjunior]

A friend of mine is trying to photograph insects etc. and she would like to know what are the best lens options to suit a non-motor body Nikon for this purpose.

I'm getting confused as Nikon do 60mm, 85mm and 105mm Micro which may suit DX vs. FX so I'm not sure which is best. Other makes like Tamron, Sigma and Tokina are fine too.

Obviously I think the cheapest option would be preferred even if this involves manual focus. I don't know how realistic this is on the D3000 as there is no live view if that matters.

Thanks in advance for your help.

 

[RCAnderson]

If all you want is a cheap option, then there is always the extension tube route, much cheaper than buying a dedicated lens. Good for starters

 

[waspjunior]

Thanks for your reply, I hadn't considered that option. I'll look into it.

 

[Nawty]

If you're shooting proper macro you use manual focus anyway, of course it would be nice to have auto-focus so you can use the lens for other things.

I would suggest that you want to get the longest possible lens so you don't have to get so close to the insects (I have a 50mm macro lens and you have to be virtually on top of things to get 1:1), with that in mind the Tamron 90mm macro lens is a great option (although make sure it's the version with the AF motor).

 

[Davec223]

The Nikon 105vr is an awesome lens, not only for macro but portraits and the such. I konow its the expensive option but in my eyes worth every penny.

Just a couple of examples

If I remember correctly just the 105vr

105vr plus full set of extension tubes.

105vr full set of extension tubes plus 1.4TC

 

[specialman]

I use a 60mm micro-nikkor (the AF-D version) which would only provide manual focussing on his camera.

Nevertheless, that length I feel is too short and like Nawty says, you'll be right on top of your subject. I used to use a 100mm macro when i shot Canon and although at times it seems you're standing miles away, the breathing space these longer lenses afford is invaluable.