I took my nikon d40x back yesterday (due to problems with the lenses) and am going to get a new camera tomorrow.....
I have the choice of a canon eos 400d with an 18-55mm, and a 55-200 mm for a total of £506, or a nikon D80 with an 18-55mm and a Tamron 55-200mm for £611 or nikon 55-200mm for £661
I can also get a manfrotto tripod (not 100% which model, 118b-2424 i think) for £45, down from £80........
Im really not sure what to do as i've only recently got into photography, and the D80 is quite a bit more than i have spent on my d40x, but both seem like good deals.
I want to get a good camera, as dont really want to be buying one after a while when i become more aware about the different features, and become a better photographer!
Which would you say i should get, both seem like good prices to me after shopping round, but is the nikon worth the step up, and if so, why?
Are there any points that i should be aware about on each of the cameras? Are these any major price differences in prices for extra parts?
I have tried both, and they both feel nice to use, though the canon is slightly more fiddly!
The last thing........ is the nikon 55-200 mm worth getting over the tamron lens?
Sorry for all of the questions people, i have tried to learn as much as i could in a short space of time, but just really need people's opinions on these, and you guys seem like the best to ask!
Thanx in advance.........Ben
I have the choice of a canon eos 400d with an 18-55mm, and a 55-200 mm for a total of £506, or a nikon D80 with an 18-55mm and a Tamron 55-200mm for £611 or nikon 55-200mm for £661
I can also get a manfrotto tripod (not 100% which model, 118b-2424 i think) for £45, down from £80........
Im really not sure what to do as i've only recently got into photography, and the D80 is quite a bit more than i have spent on my d40x, but both seem like good deals.
I want to get a good camera, as dont really want to be buying one after a while when i become more aware about the different features, and become a better photographer!
Which would you say i should get, both seem like good prices to me after shopping round, but is the nikon worth the step up, and if so, why?
Are there any points that i should be aware about on each of the cameras? Are these any major price differences in prices for extra parts?
I have tried both, and they both feel nice to use, though the canon is slightly more fiddly!
The last thing........ is the nikon 55-200 mm worth getting over the tamron lens?
Sorry for all of the questions people, i have tried to learn as much as i could in a short space of time, but just really need people's opinions on these, and you guys seem like the best to ask!
Thanx in advance.........Ben