Good thread - got me thinking.
Here's my take on it, but this just me.
I am my own severest critic. I devour quality images and aspire to match them.
Most of the time I know if I've got close or not.
But, my lack of knowledge and experience causes me to miss things that others can spot. I welcome that.
People saying it's great when I know it's not are responded to with polite thanks, but ignored.
On the other hand, you have armchair experts who criticise for the sake of it.
The ones that particularly wind me up are the ones who say, "clone this out, clean that up etc," as if they're looking for some idea of perfection that sucks the life out of the image.
They are responded to with polite thanks and ignored.
I post some rubbish on flickr, I know that. I don't post crap on here. If you don't like it, or see problems with it, tell me.
If you think it's really good, and there aren't many of them, please tell me why you think so.
Finally, this for me is a hobby, a pleasure, a way to spend time in a constructive way. It's for the enjoyment of the challenge and for enjoyment for the sake of it.
I'm not going to take myself too seriously, and I won't take anyone else too seriously unless they have something positive to contribute.
Phew!
