It's a cheap film and cheap (tesco 99p) dev.
Also, the film was in the camera for many months.
In my limited experience, the negs did look a little thin.
I scanned them myself.
I am trying to get an idea of what causes what - results wise, so I can learn and correct in the future.
How much difference does ...
Cheap or OOD film, against good / pro film make ?
or Cheap processing against pro labs ?
I am scanning myself, so that is a constant.
Any tips for scanning a bad neg, and improving the results ?
If the negative is under exposed then it could be noise from the scanner's sensor as the signal is amplified to give you an acceptable image. I think the only way to see if it is a film issue or scanner issue is to have a wet print made.