- Messages
- 11,574
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- Yes
As previously posted, a colleague at work is getting married and looking for a photographer and there's been a good response from both here and from her own looking.
She kinda raised a point which I thought was interesting and said I'd see what views I get here.
One photographer who has been in touch says they will provide all the images on a CD as part of the package and she reckoned it's a little off that others are asking for in excess of £500 for copyright to their photos.
This got me thinking, if my MD asks me to go out during work hours and photograph a job then as far as I'm aware the copyright belongs to the company I work for as it's been done during my hours of work for it.
So if you commission and pay a photographer to photograph your wedding, then isn't that photographer working for you during that period of time and therefore doesn't the copyright belong to the person doing the hiring?
One thing that springs to mind is that they are actually being subcontracted and it is subcontracting in the true sense as the photographer is providing their own equipment, insurance etc but wondering how this would stand in legal views?
She kinda raised a point which I thought was interesting and said I'd see what views I get here.
One photographer who has been in touch says they will provide all the images on a CD as part of the package and she reckoned it's a little off that others are asking for in excess of £500 for copyright to their photos.
This got me thinking, if my MD asks me to go out during work hours and photograph a job then as far as I'm aware the copyright belongs to the company I work for as it's been done during my hours of work for it.
So if you commission and pay a photographer to photograph your wedding, then isn't that photographer working for you during that period of time and therefore doesn't the copyright belong to the person doing the hiring?
One thing that springs to mind is that they are actually being subcontracted and it is subcontracting in the true sense as the photographer is providing their own equipment, insurance etc but wondering how this would stand in legal views?

but thought it could be an interesting point as she did seem a little upset at this especially when being quoted such figures for copyright release - perhaps there's a lot of brides out there who feel the same and this could be an area to be looked at? :shrug: