Neither - buy lightroom. It will do basic photo editing and most importantly it will catalogue your photographs for you. I hardly EVER have to push a photo out to photoshop - 99.999% of what i do is in lightroom.
I am using OS X too by the way.
I use Aperture and find that it's only real weak point is high ISO NR....I am an amateur though so my demands are not the highest! I am going to buy the Nik Software Dfine plug in to sort the NR.
I did look into getting them on the list, but the school would have had to help and of course weren't really interested in doing so. I found it slightly less hassle to just get Aperture.
Steelfish said:Ah that's a point actually, I kept thinking it was me not really sussing out how to do NR properly within Aperture!
Thanks for the solidarity on that issue ;-)
That's a shame, I'm one of the governors at my son's school, and see this type of thing as a service that schools should be encouraged to participate in. I'd write to your headmaster/mistress if I were you and encourage them to get on the list, even if you no longer need the service, others may benefit from it. Surely it can't be that much hassle for them.
Cheers
Aled
Yeah I thought it was me doing something wrong too. I downloaded a trial or LR 3 and the Nik plug-in for Aperture to see what they were like. Both miles better.
dubcat said:One of the reasons I recommended lightroom is that if you end up moving to windows then you will not have to go through a learning curve as lightroom is the same on both operating systems.
I can't recommend Aperture 3 enough. For most people on a Mac, there is no reason to use anything else unless. As Graham said above, it doesn't do panoramas or HDR that I'm aware of (maybe via plug in). As far as color, tint, levels, curves, sharpening, burn/dodge, noise, etc it does all of it. If you find that you use Photoshop for normal photography functions, then aperture will get the job done with much less fuss AND it will catalog all of your photos for you.
For me, I was an iPhoto user with the occasional use of GIMP for brushes level editing. Aperture gave me full iphoto (basic photo editing) plus brushes and various other bits. There is a lot more to aperture than most realize and it takes a little while to learn it. For straight photography applications, I don't need anything else.
I trialed both aperture and Lightroom for the full 30 day trial, editing the same pictures in both. For me, it was a no brainer with aperture, and that was before the price drop. I even had paid $180 for the student edition of Aperture a couple days before the app store dropped the price down (and I promptly returned the expensive copy).
Thanks,
Rick
Which nik plugin people getting I believe complete collection is £250
When Lightroom 2 and Aperture 2 came out I tried both and got on best with Lightroom, at the time the cost for upgrading my Lightroom 1 was the same as moving to Aperture, starting fresh now I think the price difference would sway me to Aperture.
I assume you are also looking at Photoshop Elements, rather than Photoshop CS5 which is a lot more advanced (and priced accordingly).
Elements and Aperture work well together, using Aperture for the organisation and the bulk of the editing and only going to Elements for really advanced editing. If you find that you like to spend ages processing images to perfection Elements may be the application for you, if you'd rather spend as little time processing as possible Aperture or Lightroom with be much more suitable.