- Messages
- 9,081
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi
A friend is asking advice on his new camera purchase, looking for something small & lightweight in his old age. Budget about £500.
He's already narrowed it down to the LX10, TZ110 (or similar). There's a big difference in reach but what I'm unsure about is aperture ... LX10 says 1.4 - 2.8 whilst the TZ110, with more zoom, comes in at 2.8 - 5.9.
He's rather put off by the latter high f. numbers, but should this make much of a difference with a camera like this? f.1.4 sounds might impressive but should we be? Says he not to concerned about DoF but low light use/performance.
Someone (K Rockwell) once said something like one shouldn't concern themselve too much with f numbers on pocket cameras. I think he used the gimmick word.
Any thoughts or recommendations.
Cheers.
A friend is asking advice on his new camera purchase, looking for something small & lightweight in his old age. Budget about £500.
He's already narrowed it down to the LX10, TZ110 (or similar). There's a big difference in reach but what I'm unsure about is aperture ... LX10 says 1.4 - 2.8 whilst the TZ110, with more zoom, comes in at 2.8 - 5.9.
He's rather put off by the latter high f. numbers, but should this make much of a difference with a camera like this? f.1.4 sounds might impressive but should we be? Says he not to concerned about DoF but low light use/performance.
Someone (K Rockwell) once said something like one shouldn't concern themselve too much with f numbers on pocket cameras. I think he used the gimmick word.
Any thoughts or recommendations.
Cheers.
Last edited: