janice
I'm going through a ''crop and be damned'' phase.................
too much foreground in #1 ....crop 50% [or more] of it off concentrates the converging stone walls into the centre..............? very nice BTW
No1
Why did you not include ALL the tree on the right?
Needs a chunk cropped off the bottom too.
I have just agreed that I need a crop off the foreground
No1
.............Needs a chunk cropped off the bottom too.
blunt, succinct, and correct...!...............
More like bl**dy rude!!!
dont take offense..
that's his style..................
Its ok, I know only too well!
Thank you.
That's ok... we all remember you of old.
Right then, I will try again!
No1
There is a lot of interest in the middle,down that valley. I personally would have liked to see all the tree on the right included & a wee bit cropped of the bottom.
I also notice 'something' sticking up on the hillside on the left. Canna help wondering what it is. Any ideas, Janice?
Liking the sky & that all the tree is included. Detail on the stone dyke (wall) is good too.
no3
Like the walls used as lead ins to the shot. Have you thought about a square crop & getting the tree on the bottom left out of the picture. Then again you would lose a bit of the shadow from the other tree into the field.
No4
I like as is. Liking the rough texture of the grass in the foreground contrasting with the different shade in the field. Like the dykes leading the eye in & the old building would probably make a shot on it's own.