Photos in a public place

[russellsnr]

I can understand the reasoning in public high security areas where taking photos can be seen as not a good idea but what baffles me is that Mr Smith goes into an area with his DSLR to take photos of something because he has a hobby that gets him out from under the wifes feet and gets harrased by security or the police but the 23 year old terrorist goes in with his mobile phone and no one says a word
Russ

 

[Steve Smith]

I believe your right as its something to do with potentially destroying evidence

If an offence has been committed (unlikely) the photograph is evidence and demanding you delete it is an offence in itself. If no offence has ben committed, demanding you delete an image is also an offence.

but the 23 year old terrorist goes in with his mobile phone and no one says a word

How can you tell that he is a terrorist?


Steve.

 

[russellsnr]

If an offence has been committed (unlikely) the photograph is evidence and demanding you delete it is an offence in itself. If no offence has ben committed, demanding you delete an image is also an offence.



How can you tell that he is a terrorist?


Steve.

Because he is using a mobile phone to take images and not a DSLR