- Messages
- 1,360
- Name
- GF
- Edit My Images
- No
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
George
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
George
Were these done at Bruntingthorpe?? Sorry to be a bit of pedant but it's a different plane in the first
GFWilliams said:Yeah, different plane in the fist shot. Shoot done for the owner of the Porsche not a mag so doesn't matter too much
Nice George - wondered if you'd put them up on here.
...and 99.9% would notice the different plain but I'm a plane nerd at least you have used another C130 the amount of news reports I see and they name on aircraft and the one they show is a totally different type of aircraft
Was 2 shots PP's for number 1. Wish I had a shot of the grey C130 taking off to shop in!
Thought I recognised the location and 99.9% would notice the different plain but I'm a plane nerd at least you have used another C130 the amount of news reports I see and they name on aircraft and the one they show is a totally different type of aircraft
I think it looks brilliant I should add
Matt
I actually don't like the 1st shot that much - 2 subjects end up distracting each other and the processing on the plane is different to the car. I think without the plane it would look better but its still an achievement getting that shot and timing it.
That said, the rest of the images are absolutely awesome! REALLY awesome!
A Lovely set, and difficult to choose a favourite. But as has been said earlier, I think the bugs need to be cloned out especially on number 4, but once see they are then noticeable on the others.
You're right, I'd never have guessed the first was a composite, I was thinking "Can't imagine that was a one people wanted to repeat over and over to get right!"
technically theyre great.
however like with the 1 series shoot i dont get the relevence of the plane.
the plane on #1 looks shopped but then i guess it is due to H&S and not being on the runway and the landing gear being up?
At least you didn't twig that the first shot was a composite eh
Thanks for the kind words about the shots people