- Messages
- 367
- Name
- Eddie
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all,
I recently bought a 350D with the standard kit lens. However I would like to get a lens which offers greater quality for some nicer pics. Funds are tight (max 150 quid I think) so I think a prime lens would be the best option where price Vs. quality is concerned.
I think going for the equivalent of 50mm in old speak would be the best option but am open to other suggestions. What would be the digital equivalent of this? 35mm?
The 50mm f1.8 seems to have lots of fans but with the digital conversion this would be more like 75 which would mean it would be no good for any landscape work. I remember reading an article on a guy who only used one camera with one lens, a leica 35mm SLR with a 50mm lens which basically replicated what the eye sees from what I remember. It worked well for street photography, urban landscapes, portraits etc.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Eddie.
I recently bought a 350D with the standard kit lens. However I would like to get a lens which offers greater quality for some nicer pics. Funds are tight (max 150 quid I think) so I think a prime lens would be the best option where price Vs. quality is concerned.
I think going for the equivalent of 50mm in old speak would be the best option but am open to other suggestions. What would be the digital equivalent of this? 35mm?
The 50mm f1.8 seems to have lots of fans but with the digital conversion this would be more like 75 which would mean it would be no good for any landscape work. I remember reading an article on a guy who only used one camera with one lens, a leica 35mm SLR with a 50mm lens which basically replicated what the eye sees from what I remember. It worked well for street photography, urban landscapes, portraits etc.
Your thoughts would be appreciated.
Eddie.