First post on here but I felt motivated to say something. As a former newspaper photographer I can say with some confidence that the only papers that have the slightest interest in the origins of a picture supplied to them by someone who's had a story written about them are the nationals who still have picture desks and picture editors. Regional papers, with one or two exceptions, don't give a monkeys because most images are handled and uploaded into their publishing systems by reporters who have little or no knowledge of, or interest in, copyright law. It's just the way it is now. Bread and butter it most certainly isn't, which you can see from the selection of extremely poor 'user generated' images used in most regional and local papers.