Raynox MSN 202 Super Macro

[vince31]

I'm just after a bit of a review on the above product , do any of you TP members use this attachment at all?

Looking forward to your responses

many thanks

Vince

 

[Dave in Wales]

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=232617&highlight=raynox

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=399615&highlight=raynox

 

[vince31]

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=232617&highlight=raynox

http://www.talkphotography.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=399615&highlight=raynox

Cheers Dave

I have read the posts on the 150 and 250 raynox , just wondered if anyone had used the Msn 202 super macro.

Regards

Vince

 

[Dave in Wales]

Cheers Dave

I have read the posts on the 150 and 250 raynox , just wondered if anyone had used the Msn 202 super macro.

Regards

Vince

Oop's sorry, thought it was a typo.

 

[*gold*]

Looking on the raynox website they describe it as for 'using with a highly advanced macro photographer or engineer' and 3.5mm will fill the frame so sounds like very specialised and to high a magnification for a lot of Macro work like most bugs and flying insects. Great for grains of sand/salt/sugar though i bet.
Hth
Atb

Cliff

 

[vince31]

Looking on the raynox website they describe it as for 'using with a highly advanced macro photographer or engineer' and 3.5mm will fill the frame so sounds like very specialised and to high a magnification for a lot of Macro work like most bugs and flying insects. Great for grains of sand/salt/sugar though i bet.
Hth
Atb

Cliff

That's why opted for the 250 !!!