sk66
Advertiser
- Messages
- 8,675
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I've spent about two months with this head now and I wrote a review/comparison as promised.
For those that are unaware, the GH-Pro is a smaller version of the Arca Swiss D4 (geared) head. It has a lower max load rating (26lb/12kg), but it costs about 1/3 the price. And the load rating is well above the Manfrotto offerings. TBF, I do think the D4 is better in the smaller details... like the GH-Pro's knobs/levers are plastic. And the D4 is much better specced... overkill really. But the main thing is I just can't personally justify the price (~$1200 vs ~$400).
The short of it is, overall I think it is very well made and functioning. It is much better than either of the Manfrotto heads in every aspect. But it has one potentially major negative... the yaw axis is not geared. Instead you get panning capability both top and bottom... which is great for landscape/architecture/etc. But if you boom the camera at an angle the "panning" yaw axis might actually be pitch or roll (or more likely part of both)... I do this a lot with product/macro photography.
I've read comments that the load rating was very overstated. To test that I mounted my D5 w/ 400/2.8 on it. That's the biggest/heaviest setup I have at ~ 3ft and 15lbs... a pretty stupid test really, but it held w/o slipping even beyond 60*, and it functioned w/o issue (but not particularly smoothly). Initially the geared adjustments were quite stiff, but they seem to be "working in" over time. This seems to be a common characteristic of geared heads... I think it's probably the grease packing.
So this leaves me kind of stuck as to my opinion or what recommendation to make. Overall the Manfrotto's are just "rougher." They're made of cast parts and comparatively roughly fit/finished. The GH-Pro (and more-so the D4) is much more refined with CNC precision and hard anodized finishes.
If you just want a pretty decent geared head for use with lighter equipment, and cost is a major factor, then I think the 410Jr is probably the best choice. I used one for years w/o issues.
If you do work where "straight and level" is a primary concern and you use heavier equipment, then the GH-Pro might be the best choice. Especially for panoramas. The price is right in the middle but it has better capabilities and finer control, plus it's the lightest. When purchasing you may or may not get hit with import taxes (2.5% US)... I didn't.
If you do work where "straight and level" is not a primary concern and the third geared axis is important (i.e. product/macro), then the GH-Pro/D4 is a no-go... it has to be one of the Manfrottos. If it's for heavier equipment, you would prefer the larger knobs, or finer adjustments are important, then it has to be the 405Pro.
For me, I'm kind of in the middle. I want the GH-Pro for architectural/landscape field use due to it's weight and functionality, but the 405Pro for the studio when I just really need/prefer that geared third axis. If I had to choose only one it would be the 405Pro and I would just have to deal with it's weight and quirks.
I decided not to do a video on it's functions... just look for a D4 review. Full Review with specs and comparisons to the D4/405/410.
For those that are unaware, the GH-Pro is a smaller version of the Arca Swiss D4 (geared) head. It has a lower max load rating (26lb/12kg), but it costs about 1/3 the price. And the load rating is well above the Manfrotto offerings. TBF, I do think the D4 is better in the smaller details... like the GH-Pro's knobs/levers are plastic. And the D4 is much better specced... overkill really. But the main thing is I just can't personally justify the price (~$1200 vs ~$400).
The short of it is, overall I think it is very well made and functioning. It is much better than either of the Manfrotto heads in every aspect. But it has one potentially major negative... the yaw axis is not geared. Instead you get panning capability both top and bottom... which is great for landscape/architecture/etc. But if you boom the camera at an angle the "panning" yaw axis might actually be pitch or roll (or more likely part of both)... I do this a lot with product/macro photography.
I've read comments that the load rating was very overstated. To test that I mounted my D5 w/ 400/2.8 on it. That's the biggest/heaviest setup I have at ~ 3ft and 15lbs... a pretty stupid test really, but it held w/o slipping even beyond 60*, and it functioned w/o issue (but not particularly smoothly). Initially the geared adjustments were quite stiff, but they seem to be "working in" over time. This seems to be a common characteristic of geared heads... I think it's probably the grease packing.
So this leaves me kind of stuck as to my opinion or what recommendation to make. Overall the Manfrotto's are just "rougher." They're made of cast parts and comparatively roughly fit/finished. The GH-Pro (and more-so the D4) is much more refined with CNC precision and hard anodized finishes.
If you just want a pretty decent geared head for use with lighter equipment, and cost is a major factor, then I think the 410Jr is probably the best choice. I used one for years w/o issues.
If you do work where "straight and level" is a primary concern and you use heavier equipment, then the GH-Pro might be the best choice. Especially for panoramas. The price is right in the middle but it has better capabilities and finer control, plus it's the lightest. When purchasing you may or may not get hit with import taxes (2.5% US)... I didn't.
If you do work where "straight and level" is not a primary concern and the third geared axis is important (i.e. product/macro), then the GH-Pro/D4 is a no-go... it has to be one of the Manfrottos. If it's for heavier equipment, you would prefer the larger knobs, or finer adjustments are important, then it has to be the 405Pro.
For me, I'm kind of in the middle. I want the GH-Pro for architectural/landscape field use due to it's weight and functionality, but the 405Pro for the studio when I just really need/prefer that geared third axis. If I had to choose only one it would be the 405Pro and I would just have to deal with it's weight and quirks.
I decided not to do a video on it's functions... just look for a D4 review. Full Review with specs and comparisons to the D4/405/410.