I was at a track day on the Nurburgring last week. The photographer for the event was Frozenspeed. I've been there before and bought his work post-event previously. The reason I've done so is because his photos are in the main not this awful 'car frozen in motion everything sharp' photos.
His photos have movement, they have blur and they properly show, err, frozen speed. They even make my old shed of a Golf look great AND if you know the 'ring you know where they were shot, because there are sufficient surroundings around the car. An example from 2010:
I had no hesitation handing over 50Euros for all of the shots of my car from the event, prior to setting a wheel on track.
Arty photos can and do sell, provided the correct balance is struck. I've been to Castle Combe on many occasions and past the first time out, when The Wife bought one of the circuit photographer's shots I have not bought any since, because they are all this run of the mill dirge.
Given the frame rate of the cameras these guys are using trackside there is no excuse NOT to shoot panning shots and get a sufficiently high rate of keepers to fill their pockets, AS WELL as the dull car-parked-on-a-track shots - you could even switch modes on alternate laps to mix it up.
Rather than whining about competition and getting potentially competing shooters thrown off site it would be much better if the established togs took the competition as a hint to up their game and out-smart the competition instead of strong-arming them.
Today's SLRs really offer an unprecedented creative opportunity for these guys. Why aren't they grabbing it? Is it just laziness, or fear of the unknown?