- Messages
- 2,659
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm a bit confused with my scanner (a CanoScan 8800F). Some shots it seems to scan brilliantly and others.... not so much. Below is an example of a 'so-so' scan comparison done at different resolutions. I can't see much difference, though one thing that is bothering me is that the lower res scan ends up with a bigger file size when resized and saved!
1
35mm Sensia slide film scanned at 2400dpi on CanoScan 8800F & saved as TIFF
CS3 processed using unsharp mask
200% + radius = 2 / Threshold = 1
Then reduced to 800 x 594 using Bicubic Sharper.
Original file size = 19MB (TIFF)
Final file size = 508KB
2
35mm Sensia slide film scanned at 4800dpi on CanoScan 8800F & saved as TIFF
CS3 processed using unsharp mask
200% + radius = 2 / Threshold = 1
Then reduced to 800 x 594 using Bicubic Sharper.
Original file size = 79MB (TIFF)
Final file size = 384KB
Here's an example of a scan that I only noticed afterwards that something was wrong...(HINT - look at the leafy ground area ). Seeing a pattern here?
This is starting to smack of something wrong with the scanner. It's also been doing extremely weird things - scanned a batch the other day where surfaces of objects came out in pixelated shades of brown, but when re-scanned came out fine...
Is it time to cast this scanner back to from whence it came? :bang:
1
35mm Sensia slide film scanned at 2400dpi on CanoScan 8800F & saved as TIFF
CS3 processed using unsharp mask
200% + radius = 2 / Threshold = 1
Then reduced to 800 x 594 using Bicubic Sharper.
Original file size = 19MB (TIFF)
Final file size = 508KB
2
35mm Sensia slide film scanned at 4800dpi on CanoScan 8800F & saved as TIFF
CS3 processed using unsharp mask
200% + radius = 2 / Threshold = 1
Then reduced to 800 x 594 using Bicubic Sharper.
Original file size = 79MB (TIFF)
Final file size = 384KB
Here's an example of a scan that I only noticed afterwards that something was wrong...(HINT - look at the leafy ground area ). Seeing a pattern here?
This is starting to smack of something wrong with the scanner. It's also been doing extremely weird things - scanned a batch the other day where surfaces of objects came out in pixelated shades of brown, but when re-scanned came out fine...
Is it time to cast this scanner back to from whence it came? :bang: