- Messages
- 3,389
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Ive been like this for months.
Weve all been there, what piece of jewellery to get next.
Ive been without a DSLR since getting shot of my D90 some months back.
The choice of lens has never been in doubt, the Nikkor 16-85 VRII, but the body is a different story.
1 Should I replace the D90, albeit this time with the better lens.
2 The D7000, latest all-singing all-dancing, the best thing since sliced bread.
3 Or the D300s.
I have read EVERY report ever written on all of them but, in the end it was up to me to put my money where my mouth is.
So ..Ive gone for the D7000.
Why, because with the D7000 I felt I was buying the latest technology and not obsolescent technology.
The D90 and D300s are both extremely fine cameras but, I had to choose.
No doubt not everyone will agree with my decision.
D in W
Weve all been there, what piece of jewellery to get next.
Ive been without a DSLR since getting shot of my D90 some months back.
The choice of lens has never been in doubt, the Nikkor 16-85 VRII, but the body is a different story.
1 Should I replace the D90, albeit this time with the better lens.
2 The D7000, latest all-singing all-dancing, the best thing since sliced bread.
3 Or the D300s.
I have read EVERY report ever written on all of them but, in the end it was up to me to put my money where my mouth is.
So ..Ive gone for the D7000.
Why, because with the D7000 I felt I was buying the latest technology and not obsolescent technology.
The D90 and D300s are both extremely fine cameras but, I had to choose.
No doubt not everyone will agree with my decision.
D in W

but I cant see me needing or using that level of technology . . . thats if I can understand it? So why pay the money . . . :shrug: