has anyone done this?
My father is remarrying and they have asked me to do the photography, I didn't really want to say no. It's a relatively low key event, church wedding 1/2 mile from home in rural somerset and then marquee in the garden, not too many guests, around 50 I'd think. I don't have a problem with being busy with this on the day over concerns of not enjoying the day because I'll be 'working' as such.
I'm happy to do it for him, but shooting people is not normally my thing (normally motorsport) so I have a couple of questions around kit and technique.
I'll get a second body for the day (I shoot a 40d) and I think my most suitable lenses are an 18-135 f3.5-5.6 and 50mm f1.8. I also have a 70-200 F4L but think this will be too zoomy on a cropped sensor and 10-20 siggy which I can't think of or have seen too many wedding compositions where it'd be useful. I don't want to be spending time swapping lenses around on the day.
I was thinking of hiring the well respected canon 17-55 f2.8 to have more of a wider range in low light, is this a good/the best option or should I be considering something else?
The bride doesn't seem to like having her photo taken so I guess I'll be more low key background shooting to try and capture moments than ordering people and groups into set poses, but I need to confirm exactly what they expect. I think they just don't want a huge fuss but would like some photos of the day and thought it'd be nice for me to do it. I've told them they might not be professional quality but they didn't seem too worried, just happy that I'd do it.
I don't own and have never used an external flash and gather most churches don't like them used for the ceremony and the reception in the garden marquee will be mostly outdoors and should be pretty light so is using natural light and large apertures a realistic option?
Having never seriously shot groups of people other than snapshots, from couples upwards in terms of numbers, what sort of f values should I be using to get suitable depth of field?
I'm guessing most shots (depending of course on composition and background) using lower f value to isolate and focus more on the happy couple is the way to go.
I've checked out the church and will be back before the ceremony to check out some shots etc but one thing that I noticed is that the church is quite tightly surrounded by relatively unattractive farm buildings so getting good shots outside the church might prove tricky, any ideas around this?
I guess to summarise my questions are:
1. which lens(es) to use
2. best way to shoot low light with kit I've got (I know I could hire a flash but unlikely to be confident shooting with it in time) might use the onboard as some under compensated fill-in, dare I go higher than iso800 on a 40d?
3. f values for shooting couple and groups
4. shooting outside church with poor backgrounds/surroundings (2 sides ugly farm buildings/barns, one side open fence to lane, other side fields but opposite direction to entrance so would never be in the background)
Any other constructive comments and suggestions welcome, thanks!
Andrew.
My father is remarrying and they have asked me to do the photography, I didn't really want to say no. It's a relatively low key event, church wedding 1/2 mile from home in rural somerset and then marquee in the garden, not too many guests, around 50 I'd think. I don't have a problem with being busy with this on the day over concerns of not enjoying the day because I'll be 'working' as such.
I'm happy to do it for him, but shooting people is not normally my thing (normally motorsport) so I have a couple of questions around kit and technique.
I'll get a second body for the day (I shoot a 40d) and I think my most suitable lenses are an 18-135 f3.5-5.6 and 50mm f1.8. I also have a 70-200 F4L but think this will be too zoomy on a cropped sensor and 10-20 siggy which I can't think of or have seen too many wedding compositions where it'd be useful. I don't want to be spending time swapping lenses around on the day.
I was thinking of hiring the well respected canon 17-55 f2.8 to have more of a wider range in low light, is this a good/the best option or should I be considering something else?
The bride doesn't seem to like having her photo taken so I guess I'll be more low key background shooting to try and capture moments than ordering people and groups into set poses, but I need to confirm exactly what they expect. I think they just don't want a huge fuss but would like some photos of the day and thought it'd be nice for me to do it. I've told them they might not be professional quality but they didn't seem too worried, just happy that I'd do it.
I don't own and have never used an external flash and gather most churches don't like them used for the ceremony and the reception in the garden marquee will be mostly outdoors and should be pretty light so is using natural light and large apertures a realistic option?
Having never seriously shot groups of people other than snapshots, from couples upwards in terms of numbers, what sort of f values should I be using to get suitable depth of field?
I'm guessing most shots (depending of course on composition and background) using lower f value to isolate and focus more on the happy couple is the way to go.
I've checked out the church and will be back before the ceremony to check out some shots etc but one thing that I noticed is that the church is quite tightly surrounded by relatively unattractive farm buildings so getting good shots outside the church might prove tricky, any ideas around this?
I guess to summarise my questions are:
1. which lens(es) to use
2. best way to shoot low light with kit I've got (I know I could hire a flash but unlikely to be confident shooting with it in time) might use the onboard as some under compensated fill-in, dare I go higher than iso800 on a 40d?
3. f values for shooting couple and groups
4. shooting outside church with poor backgrounds/surroundings (2 sides ugly farm buildings/barns, one side open fence to lane, other side fields but opposite direction to entrance so would never be in the background)
Any other constructive comments and suggestions welcome, thanks!
Andrew.
Last edited: