- Messages
- 115
- Name
- Rachel
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm desperatly trying to get into wedding photography and i've just converted from SRL to DSRL. I've wanted to do it for years but never had the cash to get started. I'm not looking for a quick fix on a new career, i know it will takes years but I'm willing to put in all the hour required and I'm very willing to learn. Everyone ones says you need to be experienced but how can you become experienced if you don't start doing weddings. Everyone has to start somewhere right.
After everyone's advise to shadow a pro as a starting point I sent out a whole load of emails to photographers in my area, pleading with them for assistance. My god did I get some awful responses!
I was expecting lots of no's, after all I'm asking a lot. But some of them were just rude!
I mentioned in the email my equipment and one guy said there was no point what so ever... everyone thats got 40D and a 24-105mm lens thinks they can be a wedding photographer! He went on to say he invested 20k in equipment (including a loft conversion, the relevance of which baffles me) before becoming the main tog! I've never forget the quote someone made in this forum about the photographer taking the picture not the camera!
I feel totally deflated!!!! He even went on to say that I had made typo's in the email and if I had no attention to detail I'd never be a good photographer!
I found this really offensive. I'm actually dyslexic and commonly get letters the wrong way round like 40D instead of D40 and vice versa, much to everyone's annoyance (most of all my own), but does that really mean I could never make it as a photographer?
I feel like jacking it all in right now and I'm hoping someone, somewhere out there can bust my confidence and tell me what to do next! :shrug:
After everyone's advise to shadow a pro as a starting point I sent out a whole load of emails to photographers in my area, pleading with them for assistance. My god did I get some awful responses!
I was expecting lots of no's, after all I'm asking a lot. But some of them were just rude!
I mentioned in the email my equipment and one guy said there was no point what so ever... everyone thats got 40D and a 24-105mm lens thinks they can be a wedding photographer! He went on to say he invested 20k in equipment (including a loft conversion, the relevance of which baffles me) before becoming the main tog! I've never forget the quote someone made in this forum about the photographer taking the picture not the camera!
I feel totally deflated!!!! He even went on to say that I had made typo's in the email and if I had no attention to detail I'd never be a good photographer!
I found this really offensive. I'm actually dyslexic and commonly get letters the wrong way round like 40D instead of D40 and vice versa, much to everyone's annoyance (most of all my own), but does that really mean I could never make it as a photographer?
I feel like jacking it all in right now and I'm hoping someone, somewhere out there can bust my confidence and tell me what to do next! :shrug: