- Messages
- 218
- Name
- Adam
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi all,
I'm looking to add an UWA lens to go with my Nikon d300 and trying to decide between either the Sigma 10-20 or the Tokina 11-16. Both are roughly around the same price. Just wanting to get opinions on both. Is having the extra range of the Sigma more useful than having the 2.8 of the Tokina?
I've already got a Sigma 17-70mm and will be using it to shoot in cities and more landscape photos too.
Thanks in advance for any help
I'm looking to add an UWA lens to go with my Nikon d300 and trying to decide between either the Sigma 10-20 or the Tokina 11-16. Both are roughly around the same price. Just wanting to get opinions on both. Is having the extra range of the Sigma more useful than having the 2.8 of the Tokina?
I've already got a Sigma 17-70mm and will be using it to shoot in cities and more landscape photos too.
Thanks in advance for any help
Tokina