- Messages
- 398
- Name
- Neil
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Looking for a lens....
ok guys, ive migrated from Olympus to Canon - should be getting a 60d next week with a 'nifty fifty'
My interest is nature photography (badgers mainly, but also birds)
On my Oly I used the 50-200mm f 2.8-3.5 (100-400mm eq) Zuiko SWD which was ok, but could have done with a teeny bit more reach - though isnt that always the case!
When i'm shooting the badgers this is done in daylight, though the forest canopy makes it darker.
Wide open at 3.5 I got good results at iso 400 (my E510 got noticably noisey at 800 and above)
The 60d should handle higher iso better so i'm factoring that in when looking for a lens though I dont want to go slower than f4
Budget is circa £800 - though at a push this could go up by £100
What I am looking for is a lens that will fulfill my nature requirements but will also be handy as and when other subjects present themselves - such as sports and a trip to the mach loop!
I've seen the following :
Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG APO HSM EX DG at a good price
Canon 70-200mm f2.8 which is about there budget-wise
I know I said I wanted a little more reach but I'm guessing at f2.8 the canon will more than able to take a teleconverter later and still stay fast.
Neither lens has IS which might be an issue, though I tend to shoot with a mono or tripod (manily mono for the badgers as i can move easier)
Have you guys had any experince of the Sigma and the image quality it can provide - especially wide open at 300mm?
Also are there any other lenses I've not considered, which you think I should?
- dont really want a prime as I like the flexibility of a zoom.
Thanks for reading and anything you can suggest to help will be appreciated.
Regards
Neil
ok guys, ive migrated from Olympus to Canon - should be getting a 60d next week with a 'nifty fifty'
My interest is nature photography (badgers mainly, but also birds)
On my Oly I used the 50-200mm f 2.8-3.5 (100-400mm eq) Zuiko SWD which was ok, but could have done with a teeny bit more reach - though isnt that always the case!
When i'm shooting the badgers this is done in daylight, though the forest canopy makes it darker.
Wide open at 3.5 I got good results at iso 400 (my E510 got noticably noisey at 800 and above)
The 60d should handle higher iso better so i'm factoring that in when looking for a lens though I dont want to go slower than f4
Budget is circa £800 - though at a push this could go up by £100
What I am looking for is a lens that will fulfill my nature requirements but will also be handy as and when other subjects present themselves - such as sports and a trip to the mach loop!
I've seen the following :
Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG APO HSM EX DG at a good price
Canon 70-200mm f2.8 which is about there budget-wise
I know I said I wanted a little more reach but I'm guessing at f2.8 the canon will more than able to take a teleconverter later and still stay fast.
Neither lens has IS which might be an issue, though I tend to shoot with a mono or tripod (manily mono for the badgers as i can move easier)
Have you guys had any experince of the Sigma and the image quality it can provide - especially wide open at 300mm?
Also are there any other lenses I've not considered, which you think I should?
- dont really want a prime as I like the flexibility of a zoom.
Thanks for reading and anything you can suggest to help will be appreciated.
Regards
Neil