Sigma 18-35- looks good

Messages
1,517
Name
Dr Ozone
Edit My Images
Yes
Now I am not the biggest Sigma fan because their quality control quite frankly has been abysmal but have been keen to try their new lenses for a while as they had reportedly upped their game. I was always slightly skeptical having been reassured before by their senior management that they were changing their game and not seeing results. I suppose the fact that it took them that long to turn it around (3yrs) shows to some extent how much work was needed. It does seem they couldn't fix what they had and ended up taking a ground up approach. To that end I still would not recommend any Sigma lens that was not part of their Art or Sport range because it's just too variable and not worth the effort. That doesn't mean they are no good but if time is money then I wouldn't get say a 10-20 and hope it worked first time round- chances are it wont although I appreciate YMMV;).

Anyway, had my hands on a mates 18-35 today (not attached to body) and was genuinely impressed:). I must say I really liked the build quality- really nice finish and smooth focus ring and zoom ring- internal zoom as well. A fair weight to it as well. 72mm filter. He assures my AF is fast and it's very sharp. Seen some images on the camera LCD before as were still on card and they looked sharp but always hard to really say. I'll look to get some shots form it in the next couple of weeks but if the image quality is consistent with build I think it would make a great step up from the kit lens for people.
 
Nice lens to be sure and at 1.8 could replace a few primes.

Would be more tempted if it had a bit more range - say 16-50 but obviously it would be monstrously big were that the case.
 
It depends what you shoot whether the range is of use I guess. Lots of people blindly recommend buying a 50mm to beginners but I can count the number of photos I have at that length on both hands and that's from FF and APS-C cameras. It's just not a focal length I like for my style. You're right though that many would prefer slightly longer but I guess the max aperture is the real draw here
 
Yep, undoubtedly a great low light option. I'd like to try one out, can't decide if its something I'd use enough to warrant the price.
 
50mm on crop is pretty bleh to me, but the interesting point is replacing primes, there arent many fast primes below 30mm ish, and even less fast, cheap primes intended for crop?
i think using there own sensors to test the lenses might be part of the reason why the recent stuff has been so good, itll show up anything that isnt amazing
 
True the IQ is superb and the AF is accurate although slow. No where near the canons USM and tbh it's the only reason I didn't buy this lens.
 
Can't say I've found mine focuses slowly but then again there isn't much focusing required at 18-35mm! If I want slow focus then I'll use my 100mm F2.8L or my 100-400mm lol
 
Back
Top