- Messages
- 1,746
- Name
- Si
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm a Nikon shooter, mostly using primes for landscapes. I've got a 20 1.8 and 35 1.8, but I'm finding I sometimes miss the focal lengths in between. I'm reluctant to plug the gap with the 24/28 1.8 primes as I'm getting to the stage where I can't fit everything in my bag and I'm wondering if the Sigma could effectively replace the 24/28/35mm.
I had and recently sold the 24-120 f4 as the corners were soft and was left disappointed every time I used it. I've looked at the 24-70 2.8G and it looks like they are generally a bit soft in the corners too compared to the primes. Online reviews of the Sigma look good, but is anyone on here using the Sigma 24-35 f2 for landscapes and if so, what do you think of it? Any other options I should consider?
I had and recently sold the 24-120 f4 as the corners were soft and was left disappointed every time I used it. I've looked at the 24-70 2.8G and it looks like they are generally a bit soft in the corners too compared to the primes. Online reviews of the Sigma look good, but is anyone on here using the Sigma 24-35 f2 for landscapes and if so, what do you think of it? Any other options I should consider?