- Messages
- 1,292
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- No
Posted this up on the eos forum but thought I would throw it open to you guys as well.
I think that there must be something seriously wrong with me - why?
I had a 7D used it for about 6 months then got the 1D mk4 - after reading up on how great it was and how it would blow the 7D out of the water in every way, and once I shot with a 1 series I would never go back etc etc. . . . well 6 months on again and I have gone back to the 7D - why?
I just don't get it? 3.5k body against a 1k body - where is the 2.5k difference / improvement? I shoot everything from macro's to flowers through kite surfers and animals at the zoo right up to my main interest motorsport, and from my point of view the 7D wins hands down every time, I only shoot in daytime so rarely go above iso 400 even when it's chucking it down with rain. Main glass is the 70-200 2.8 mk2 / tamron 90 / 24-100. Is it because I can't afford the big 2.8 primes that surly the 1D series was made for and so I'm not using it's full potential?
Photo's from the 7D are just as sharp / colourful as those from the mk4, they print out larger (have a print done at 45" and not a jagged line to be seen) and crop in fine, everything just seems . . . . easier for want of a better word.
Again - today I was reading one of the typical 'should I upgrade to a 1D' topics and the replies are all the same, so what am I missing - please let me know while I still own both bodies (although the mk4 is boxed up ready to sell)
Thanks in advance
.DAVID. - Confused from Essex
I think that there must be something seriously wrong with me - why?
I had a 7D used it for about 6 months then got the 1D mk4 - after reading up on how great it was and how it would blow the 7D out of the water in every way, and once I shot with a 1 series I would never go back etc etc. . . . well 6 months on again and I have gone back to the 7D - why?
I just don't get it? 3.5k body against a 1k body - where is the 2.5k difference / improvement? I shoot everything from macro's to flowers through kite surfers and animals at the zoo right up to my main interest motorsport, and from my point of view the 7D wins hands down every time, I only shoot in daytime so rarely go above iso 400 even when it's chucking it down with rain. Main glass is the 70-200 2.8 mk2 / tamron 90 / 24-100. Is it because I can't afford the big 2.8 primes that surly the 1D series was made for and so I'm not using it's full potential?
Photo's from the 7D are just as sharp / colourful as those from the mk4, they print out larger (have a print done at 45" and not a jagged line to be seen) and crop in fine, everything just seems . . . . easier for want of a better word.
Again - today I was reading one of the typical 'should I upgrade to a 1D' topics and the replies are all the same, so what am I missing - please let me know while I still own both bodies (although the mk4 is boxed up ready to sell)
Thanks in advance
.DAVID. - Confused from Essex