I know what Dans looking for and its not a lens with a big adapter. Gee, I wonder if the rokkor is smaller a) because its nowhere near as good as a Sigma 50mm and b) because its got no AF
I think everyones seen your ramblings about that combination and A7 in general by now. And no, its still not compact like a LM lens, which is what hes looking for unless the aperture is super fast, then he'll consider additional size. I might be mistaken though, but doubt it.
What's the output of this setup? any good for bokeh etc
https://www.flickr.com/search?sort=relevance&text=mitakon 50mm 0.95
this Mitakon doesn't seem like a bad egg to be fair..if just to get the 0.95
then i could get a 50mm 1.8 FE alongside it hmm
Yeah, why not. What about a 50 mitakon and 35 biogon zm?
Is that the 2.8 or 2?
Found this on the f2 so far.
http://blog.kasson.com/?p=6203
also info to suggest it's not as good as the loxia, (edit scrub that my comment was about the 35mm FE not loxia)
http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20140904_1012-ZeissLoxia-vs-ZM.html
http://www.sonyalpharumors.com/good...nctly-and-visibly-better-than-the-zm-version/
I know what Dans looking for and its not a lens with a big adapter. Gee, I wonder if the rokkor is smaller a) because its nowhere near as good as a Sigma 50mm and b) because its got no AF
I think everyones seen your ramblings about that combination and A7 in general by now. And no, its still not compact like a LM lens, which is what hes looking for unless the aperture is super fast, then he'll consider additional size. I might be mistaken though, but doubt it.
Oh er... You are a nasty piece of work aren't you?
For whatever reason you seem to be off on a little crusade about this, you say the same thing in thread after thread.
The combination of A7 or MFT with old lenses and adapters may not be for everyone but they're simply not the gargantuan ungainly things you insist that they are in thread after thread after thread... but I'm tired of trying to provide a balanced view on this.
Twist, I've just had it with the repetitiveness of this and the added nastiness is the end of it for me. I ignore your posts and please ignore mine.
Presumably the A7 would be a very good alternative for a Leica digital …….. I am looking to replace my M8 because generally at anything over ISO 320 it can be dissapointing
I'm really considering getting an A7 to use with "old" MF lens, although I have just been using a DP3M for a couple of days and I can see why even with it's many many drawbacks and there are so many, it is such a unique, (for the price), and maybe just unique because it is unique ….. that I cannot put it down and I can see why some have bought all three "M" models.
The Sony FX bodies are however so appealing, I'm not sure I would buy another new Nikon DSLR, (I have what I need for birding with the D7100 and D700), until Nikon produce a mirroless FX body with an F mount fitting.
But Panamoz are now not delivering until after the New Year and Hdew do not stock Sony ……. plus also the A7ii is on sale albeit at a far higher price
This is an interesting discussion, reminds me go when M4/3's were first realised