thread cleaned, lets get back to helping and advising the OP please guys
My best advice is to immediately buy a used 400 2.8 .
My best advice is to immediately buy a used 400 2.8 .
All the sport I have shot over the years, all I have used is a 70-200mm f2.8 and occasionally had the use of a 300mm f2.8 never had a problem with producing good images.
whitey said:Advice given has been spot on for me to
Papers will take as much as they can without paying for them, I've noticed it as far up as regionals
I've been asked to run pics with credit and refused, I've also been approached by papers who claim not to have budget for that kind of thing to submit images at there local rate (which I've had cleared was correct) there is also a day rate they use to which i was approached with for a nice day trip some weeks back
Be tough but fair with your stance regarding them
Also, I would say, enjoy it. don't feel under pressure to get results early on. I was lucky enough to be given the chance at a local club who have been on the up for a few years and get along with players now who always give me feedback and say things about the pics I take
Not the same for everyone I know but at first, enjoy it, get to know people and then try and push your way around the local league/up from there. get yourself a conference license and get in with papers once they get used to your work aswell. that can get you the break once you get things built up
All the sport I have shot over the years, all I have used is a 70-200mm f2.8 and occasionally had the use of a 300mm f2.8 never had a problem with producing good images.
Neither did i, but the 400mm f/2.8 is a different ball game, i even have a 1.4x glued on mine all the time giving me 560mm on full frameAll the sport I have shot over the years, all I have used is a 70-200mm f2.8 and occasionally had the use of a 300mm f2.8 never had a problem with producing good images.
Sorry - I'm being a bit tongue in cheek as I've got one for sale...
dont do a lot of cricket then?
Must be hard playing on a hill
Knowing what the action is and when the vital moment occurs is the key and expensive kit can't buy that. You have to walk before you can run.
Im investing in a Canon 1d mkiv, Canon 400mm F2.8, Canon 70-200mm F2.8 and a 24-780mm F2.8.
That would be some lens 24-780
Now im a great beleiver of that, i figure im quite decent at shooting my chosen subject and i certainally put some of that down to playing the game from being a nipper and having a good understanding of the game in general.
ooops, sorry Graham if I offended, there was no need to remove the pics. Just a little banter that's all
Ya forgetting weve met Simon, i would have had you down as a prop.I find I'm biased to the backs when it comes to RL, I used to play center and winger....Wonder why I'm biased !! lol
No problem Phil, I just grabbed a couple of unedited images from my archive folder, the ones that were published were on level ground The problem is my right leg is 2 inches shorter than my left one
Ya forgetting weve met Simon, i would have had you down as a prop. .
Ya forgetting weve met Simon, i would have had you down as a prop.
You going to Wakey for the Challenge Cup match gainst Cas on Saturday mate, ill be there, then Bradford v Wigan on Sunday.
Got another job on Gary. Wildcats game me thinks.
Oooh, err missus, better than all dressing the same in black gowns and white wigs.I thought all the players look the same in League?
Tobers said:I've got my 400 2.8 for sale in the Canon classifieds on this forum for £2500.
Dont think anyones made that direct assumption mate, however i think folk are leaning towards that way of thinking because the OP himself has indicated a desire to improve
It would be useful if the OP did post some stuff though
WTF you on about, theres absolutly nothing wrong with wanting to improve and ive never said otherwise, the opposite in fact. so why quote something i said without it including the reference i was replying to.What's wrong with him wanting to improve? I love football but have only shot it once. And that time was when I was out playing footy with other 13 year olds. So yes I would also like to improve and I am sure that most people here, if not everyone wants to improve in something.
WTF you on about, theres absolutly nothing wrong with wanting to improve and ive never said otherwise, the opposite in fact. so why quote something i said without it including the reference i was replying to.
Assassin said:G'day Tobers, why are you selling your 400? Am also looking at selling mine, needing 600mm now....
Paul,
If you haven't used a 400mm f2.8 before, I would highly recommend that you hire one and try it out before investing the money in one. Also, if you use a 400mm f2.8 for rugby (or any other pitch-based sport) then you will definitely need a shorter lens (70-200mm) on a second body to catch all the action. If you only had one body then a good alternative would be a Sigma 120-300mm f2.8.
Cheers,
Dave