Tamron SP AF 60mm f/2 Di II Macro

Messages
7,200
Name
Peter
Edit My Images
No
Looking for advice regards the Tamron SP AF 60mm f/2 Di II Macro lens, anyone here own/use it? Anyone used this on a 5D MkII full-frame sensor..?


Would appreciate any views/comments/experience please...
 
The only other alternative for full frame in that price bracket (i think) is the tried and tested Tamron 90mm (not the new VC version thats a different beastie altogether)

On FF the 90mm makes mire sense from a versatile point of view, the 90mm is a superbly sharp portrait lens as well. The 60mm on a crop body would be also but on the 5D its limited to a good macro lens (imo)
Now normally the longer focal length is preferable for macro in order to not disturb flighty / nervous subjects, so you would think the 90mm is the obvious choice but the lens on the Tamron 90mm is recessed and as a result the closest focus distance is 100mm (same as the 60mm) so no advantage there.
The 60mm is a newer design and from reviews it looks great tbh and quite the bargain really.

I only have crop bodies so cannot comment on the FF usage but someone else will probably help out there.




SCRATCH THE ABOVE:
Just checked and the 60mm is APS-c. It wont fit your 5d :-0

Looks like that 90mm is looking good now. Lol
 
Last edited:
Yes, Tamron 60mm macro is APS-C only, though it's a cracking little lens. Best of all, it's f/2 so makes an especially nice portrait lens if shallow DoF is your thing. AF is micromotor as opposed to ultrasonic but works well enough; manual focusing is a bit jerky though.

Tamron's now-classic 90mm (non-VC) is also very good but the different mechanical design and deeply recessed front element means it doesn't have such a long Minimum Working Distance as most other 90-100mm macros that are around 13-14cm. At 9cm it's actually a few mms less than the 60mm lens.

If it's good MWD you want, Canon's 100mm f/2.8 (non-L) is best at 15cm. Great optics and build quality, decent value.
 
Back
Top