- Messages
- 2,695
- Name
- Peter
- Edit My Images
- No
Hi All,
Sitting very much on the fence over whether to go for 500/4 or 200-400/4 Nikkors....
Trying to persuade myself to go for the 200-400/4 - more for versatility and portability. I know how good the 500/4 is and looking for copies without AF squeal (one does nature)...
I have 2 Nikon TCs , The 1.4 and 1.7 TC-E Marks 2 I've had for a while, and used on my D500 and D850 bodies so no issues with f8 compatibility but has anyone got any positive or negative experiences with the 200-400/4 using either teleconverter? The 400/2.8 and 600/4 are just outside my price range and want the f4 or brighter lenses.
Looking forward to some feedback.
Peter
Sitting very much on the fence over whether to go for 500/4 or 200-400/4 Nikkors....
Trying to persuade myself to go for the 200-400/4 - more for versatility and portability. I know how good the 500/4 is and looking for copies without AF squeal (one does nature)...
I have 2 Nikon TCs , The 1.4 and 1.7 TC-E Marks 2 I've had for a while, and used on my D500 and D850 bodies so no issues with f8 compatibility but has anyone got any positive or negative experiences with the 200-400/4 using either teleconverter? The 400/2.8 and 600/4 are just outside my price range and want the f4 or brighter lenses.
Looking forward to some feedback.
Peter