- Messages
- 470
- Name
- Stewart
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Evening Folks,
This topic was prompted by a couple of discussion I have read on here recently about compact cameras so I thought that since I was in the same position I would take the time to create a topic that may be of interest.
I have been pondering the same issue of late because my landscape photography is taking me further and further away from sea level and I have started to really enjoy the hiking aspect that photography has introduced me to.
The problem is, once you start getting into hiking up high you need to start carrying a lot of safety equipment like crampons, waterproofs, spare clothes, food and drink, ice axes, poles, maps, torches, the list goes on, so my 14KG Lowepro Vertex 300AW backpack and Manfrotto Tripod and comedy weight 405 geared head has had to make way for a decent hiking rucksack which means my 5D3 and 16-35 F4 IS L lens is now only carried in a small padded camera bag, packed up safely in the bottom of the rucksack.
Suddenly, taking an image that isn't a deal breaker is now a ballache of unpacking a lot of gear and messing around to get it all out and of course my non photographer hiking buddies get a bit frustrated, and while they dont complain, you can see it in their eyes..."Oh no, not again".
Because of this I have found myself coming home with less and less images and making a conscious decision to ignore shots I would ordinarily have taken the time to try and make the best of.
I also like to make trip reports on a hiking forum I use and again, I have no "bread and butter" images for such a topic as I can't be bothered stripping the rucksack out just to take a picture illustrating "we parked here" or "lunchtime" (Example report and an Idea of the kind of trip i am talking about here)
So I've been scouring reviews for a month or so and popping in camera stores to handle stuff, looking for a pocket sized camera that can still produce decent results. I still take my SLR, thats a given, but I want to be able to leave it packed away until a serious opportunity arises.
I think I have now found my solution. The Canon G7X.
It was a dead heat between this and the comparable Sony but I went this way as:
A) I like Canon
B) I think the 100mm effective zoom is going to be useful to me.
C) The touch screen focus is a really nice feature I feel I will enjoy using.
D) It offers Canons "Custom Mode" That lets me set that part up just how I want it and remember it, so I can preset the camera for the expected usage. (ISO 200, F5.6, Single point focus, 24mm Zoom, RAW etc for example) and it just switches to that lot as soon as its turned on. This has always been one of my favourite Canon features and I am very happy its made it to their compacts.
So - I went out at weekend to a quiet spot I know where I could just chill out and enjoy the camera without being bothered and I took a few test shots side by side with my 5D3, trying to get the same composition as best as possible. I must admit that I am more than shocked at its capabilities.
Technicals of the next 4 images:
All shot raw.
The 5D3 was on tripod for both images and the G7X handheld hence the slightly higher ISO.
I've used f5.6 on the G7X as I've done a few tests and it's significantly diffraction limited at F8.
The 5D3 was set to ISO100 - f/8 and both cameras focused on the same point in the scenes.
Test 1:
Overcast day. Good light.
Test 2:
Same day near sunset. Overcast, quite low light.
Can you easily tell which Camera shot which image?
Yes, I obviously realise that blown up to A1 on a wall we are (hopefully) going to see at least a little difference, but for normal A4 printing and indeed undoubtedly for web use, this little camera really is pretty amazing and I am more than impressed by its tiny 1" sensor when compared in the real world and real UK light next to my full frame 5D MK3. Remember, we are talking £3500 Vs £450 here.
I shot an image out of the car window at 50mm zoom on the way to location 2.
And this is that same image cropped at 1:1
And finally, nothing more than a snapshot I took in a dark cave yesterday with the family.
I just left it on auto to see what it could do...
So, not the greatest or most scientific tests, nor the greatest scenes, but that wasn't the point, I wanted to see how it fared on an average day as an alternative to my SLR for "Non Money Shots" as I call them. And its an absolute winner for me.
I am certainly not selling up or anything dramatic like that and will still usually be carrying my SLR for the awesome opportunities that sometimes arise, but I think on most of my hikes, this Canon G7X is going to become my go-to camera as its so damn accessible and fits in any pocket you choose.
I made this topic purely in the hope that it might help someone looking for a small pocket sized compact, and indeed hope that it may be of some interest to others.
This topic was prompted by a couple of discussion I have read on here recently about compact cameras so I thought that since I was in the same position I would take the time to create a topic that may be of interest.
I have been pondering the same issue of late because my landscape photography is taking me further and further away from sea level and I have started to really enjoy the hiking aspect that photography has introduced me to.
The problem is, once you start getting into hiking up high you need to start carrying a lot of safety equipment like crampons, waterproofs, spare clothes, food and drink, ice axes, poles, maps, torches, the list goes on, so my 14KG Lowepro Vertex 300AW backpack and Manfrotto Tripod and comedy weight 405 geared head has had to make way for a decent hiking rucksack which means my 5D3 and 16-35 F4 IS L lens is now only carried in a small padded camera bag, packed up safely in the bottom of the rucksack.
Suddenly, taking an image that isn't a deal breaker is now a ballache of unpacking a lot of gear and messing around to get it all out and of course my non photographer hiking buddies get a bit frustrated, and while they dont complain, you can see it in their eyes..."Oh no, not again".
Because of this I have found myself coming home with less and less images and making a conscious decision to ignore shots I would ordinarily have taken the time to try and make the best of.
I also like to make trip reports on a hiking forum I use and again, I have no "bread and butter" images for such a topic as I can't be bothered stripping the rucksack out just to take a picture illustrating "we parked here" or "lunchtime" (Example report and an Idea of the kind of trip i am talking about here)
So I've been scouring reviews for a month or so and popping in camera stores to handle stuff, looking for a pocket sized camera that can still produce decent results. I still take my SLR, thats a given, but I want to be able to leave it packed away until a serious opportunity arises.
I think I have now found my solution. The Canon G7X.
It was a dead heat between this and the comparable Sony but I went this way as:
A) I like Canon
B) I think the 100mm effective zoom is going to be useful to me.
C) The touch screen focus is a really nice feature I feel I will enjoy using.
D) It offers Canons "Custom Mode" That lets me set that part up just how I want it and remember it, so I can preset the camera for the expected usage. (ISO 200, F5.6, Single point focus, 24mm Zoom, RAW etc for example) and it just switches to that lot as soon as its turned on. This has always been one of my favourite Canon features and I am very happy its made it to their compacts.
So - I went out at weekend to a quiet spot I know where I could just chill out and enjoy the camera without being bothered and I took a few test shots side by side with my 5D3, trying to get the same composition as best as possible. I must admit that I am more than shocked at its capabilities.
Technicals of the next 4 images:
All shot raw.
The 5D3 was on tripod for both images and the G7X handheld hence the slightly higher ISO.
I've used f5.6 on the G7X as I've done a few tests and it's significantly diffraction limited at F8.
The 5D3 was set to ISO100 - f/8 and both cameras focused on the same point in the scenes.
Test 1:
Overcast day. Good light.
Test 2:
Same day near sunset. Overcast, quite low light.
Can you easily tell which Camera shot which image?
Yes, I obviously realise that blown up to A1 on a wall we are (hopefully) going to see at least a little difference, but for normal A4 printing and indeed undoubtedly for web use, this little camera really is pretty amazing and I am more than impressed by its tiny 1" sensor when compared in the real world and real UK light next to my full frame 5D MK3. Remember, we are talking £3500 Vs £450 here.
I shot an image out of the car window at 50mm zoom on the way to location 2.
And this is that same image cropped at 1:1
And finally, nothing more than a snapshot I took in a dark cave yesterday with the family.
I just left it on auto to see what it could do...
So, not the greatest or most scientific tests, nor the greatest scenes, but that wasn't the point, I wanted to see how it fared on an average day as an alternative to my SLR for "Non Money Shots" as I call them. And its an absolute winner for me.
I am certainly not selling up or anything dramatic like that and will still usually be carrying my SLR for the awesome opportunities that sometimes arise, but I think on most of my hikes, this Canon G7X is going to become my go-to camera as its so damn accessible and fits in any pocket you choose.
I made this topic purely in the hope that it might help someone looking for a small pocket sized compact, and indeed hope that it may be of some interest to others.
Last edited: