Yup, always been their problem, to many cameras, fast releases, depreciation, not enough 3rd party support, no real worldwide pro/repair network and lenses. I hope they turn that all around with FE mount.
Last edited:
The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!
- Thread starter woof woof
- Start date
Yup, always been their problem, to many cameras, fast releases, depreciation, not enough 3rd party support, no real worldwide pro/repair network and lenses. I hope they turn that all around with FE mount.
- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
Yea..
I wish they don't release another camera for 2 years at least and just keep releasing new lenses
Yup. I think 2 years is decent between releases. Its good to push tech but its bad to not support the system as a whole. The A7rii can easily have a 2yr lifespan imo.
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Sony will get it done this time around imo otherwise the will have another A-mount scenario. Their Pro Support network is active in certain countries and the UK is high up the list also to get it next.
I agree though, they need to slow down on a year new body release schedule
- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
Ye. I think it could last for more then that tbh
AF needs improving though so I wouldve thought 2 years is a good number.
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Yep, but from what Sony has said, 2016 is going to be a even bigger year than 2015, makes me think a new wave of bodies will be announced before the year is out with better speed etc.
Probably a A7III, A7RIII and A7SIII all in one release?
Or perhaps a new A9 series?
I think Sony have hit the sweet spot in having 3 bodies, each catering for a different customer base.
Sony could just keep to 3 bodies per generation, that's what I would do and bypass building a new model range like the A9.
The A7RII is no slouch, I know somebody who uses a A7II for weddings and he's got on fine.
A7iii more likely, no way an A7riii or siii. A9, like I said, doubt it, maybe a mirrorless mid range DSLR size camera. A77 sans mirror. New compacts and bridges, perhaps.
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Good first impressions on the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM by the Huffster
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2016/03/03/two-days-with-the-sony-g-master-24-70-f2-8-lens/
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2016/03/03/two-days-with-the-sony-g-master-24-70-f2-8-lens/
- Messages
- 8,444
- Edit My Images
- No
Indeed
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
I think it has to beat Canon & Nikon rivals otherwise Sony will have egg on their faces following their high PR marketing of the new G Master range etc.
I'm holding back at the moment to see what real-life reviews and tests say, hopefully my GAS will have died by then.
lolExtreme corner, Sony GM 24-70/f2.8 on the right, Canon 24-70/f2.8L in the middle, Sony 24-70/f4 on the left, all shot at f8
Found here http://www.pf.nl/hands-on-met-sony-g-master-objectieven-en-a6300/
Last edited:
- Messages
- 532
- Name
- Ray
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Impressive. Not only does the Sony look a lot better, it also seems to have some algorithm for removing stray feet from photos. Hopefully it doesn't malfunction and turn everyone into mermaids.I think it has to beat Canon & Nikon rivals otherwise Sony will have egg on their faces following their high PR marketing of the new G Master range etc.
I'm holding back at the moment to see what real-life reviews and tests say, hopefully my GAS will have died by then.
Sony FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM (Right) Vs Canon 24-70mm f2.8 L (Left)
View attachment 58550
Found here http://www.pf.nl/hands-on-met-sony-g-master-objectieven-en-a6300/
- Messages
- 1,402
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
Used the GM 24-70 & 85 for literally a couple of snaps each at a Sony event earlier this week. Big but easy enough to get on terms with and not imbalanced, which is a little surprising given the diminutive size of the A7x bodies. 85 snapped to focus in -4 EV (according to subsequent exif) but I didn't get to challenge the zoom with a low light AF test.
Also sat through a bit of a G Master presentation, much of which was the same stuff the press was briefed with previously. Of interest: Sony [rightfully] very pleased with corner sharpness full stop, but esp when compared to Canon & Nikon 'equivalents'. Same goes for CA and bokeh rendering. All the examples we saw and had the opportunity to try seemed to back up the claims, which leaves the 24-70 standing alone for quality vs Canon & Nikon. Similar situation for the 85. However, it has some acknowledged tough competition in the Batis, albeit their image profile is intentionally different. In the shared samples (at the presentation; I'm not prepared to share my images because they feature people) the Batis offers visibly stronger contrast whilst the GM has smoother fall-off and more consistent bokeh.
If I had to choose one of the two GM lenses it'd be tough. Obviously they're for different purposes and the zoom suits my needs much more clearly but I have a lot of lust for the 85.
It was also alluded to that there'll be a couple more E-Mount lenses announced/ released this year. No word on what, though.
Also sat through a bit of a G Master presentation, much of which was the same stuff the press was briefed with previously. Of interest: Sony [rightfully] very pleased with corner sharpness full stop, but esp when compared to Canon & Nikon 'equivalents'. Same goes for CA and bokeh rendering. All the examples we saw and had the opportunity to try seemed to back up the claims, which leaves the 24-70 standing alone for quality vs Canon & Nikon. Similar situation for the 85. However, it has some acknowledged tough competition in the Batis, albeit their image profile is intentionally different. In the shared samples (at the presentation; I'm not prepared to share my images because they feature people) the Batis offers visibly stronger contrast whilst the GM has smoother fall-off and more consistent bokeh.
If I had to choose one of the two GM lenses it'd be tough. Obviously they're for different purposes and the zoom suits my needs much more clearly but I have a lot of lust for the 85.
It was also alluded to that there'll be a couple more E-Mount lenses announced/ released this year. No word on what, though.
- Messages
- 2,405
- Name
- owen
- Edit My Images
- No
Until I can see a proper test of the gm lenses I'm not convinced tbh too many of these reviewers these days aren't as impartial as what they should be......
The gm does look promising no doubt but the posts and pics posted so far aren't a scientific test of the lenses.... it almost looks as though the nikon and canon were deliberately misfocused..........
The gm does look promising no doubt but the posts and pics posted so far aren't a scientific test of the lenses.... it almost looks as though the nikon and canon were deliberately misfocused..........
OP
woof woof
I like a nice Chianti
- Messages
- 39,743
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
How often do we want sharpness across the frame that stands up to pixel peeping or close viewing of very large prints?
It may be that I have relatively low standards (I do) but I do keep thinking that we're nit picking kit that's perfectly good enough for the vast majority or people in the vast majority of situations.
It's good to keep pushing the boundaries though
It may be that I have relatively low standards (I do) but I do keep thinking that we're nit picking kit that's perfectly good enough for the vast majority or people in the vast majority of situations.
It's good to keep pushing the boundaries though
- Messages
- 788
- Name
- Jamie
- Edit My Images
- No
How often do we want sharpness across the frame that stands up to pixel peeping or close viewing of very large prints?
It may be that I have relatively low standards (I do) but I do keep thinking that we're nit picking kit that's perfectly good enough for the vast majority or people in the vast majority of situations.
It's good to keep pushing the boundaries though
At these prices every nit has to be picked IMO
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
I've got the Batis 85mm f1.8 and initial impressions are great, it will serve me well.
I'm watching the Sony 24-70mm, 70-200mm f2.8 GM's along with the Teleconverters
- Messages
- 2,405
- Name
- owen
- Edit My Images
- No
what are you taking pics of mate?I've got the Batis 85mm f1.8 and initial impressions are great, it will serve me well.
I'm watching the Sony 24-70mm, 70-200mm f2.8 GM's along with the Teleconverters
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Nothing at all, I'm just a GAS whore
- Messages
- 2,405
- Name
- owen
- Edit My Images
- No
If this is the quality of the sigma mc11 they can keep it I won't be buying it .....
View: http://youtu.be/Xx3oPZzA3no
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Might do, firmware improvements etc.
- Messages
- 2,405
- Name
- owen
- Edit My Images
- No
Hope so mate I really do I was all up for buying one until I saw that ....Might do, firmware improvements etc.
- Messages
- 9,429
- Name
- Jonathan
- Edit My Images
- No
I may be a few k in the red but have a really nice line up of native glass now.
Just need a macro and something for wildlife. That may have to be on Nikon though for obvious reasons.
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
Mmmm Sony 90mm f2.8 G Macro isn't too bad?
For telephoto if you already have a Nikon body it'll be the awesome 70-200mm f2.8 VRII plus TC?
- Messages
- 9,429
- Name
- Jonathan
- Edit My Images
- No
Mmmm Sony 90mm f2.8 G Macro isn't too bad?
For telephoto if you already have a Nikon body it'll be the awesome 70-200mm f2.8 VRII plus TC?
90 looks lovely although highly priced compared what is available for dslr.
70-200 is a good shout. Although may want something in the region of 150-600.
- Messages
- 14,766
- Name
- Michael
- Edit My Images
- No
Just having a bit of an out loud think, as the photography show is coming up there is a possibility of some good deals on some of a models.
How is the af performance on the a7 and how has it improved through the ranges? Also focus to shot time. I currently use a 7dmk2 and an eos m and also we have a Panasonic g7. I fancy something smaller and higher quality.
Oh and also these adapters that allow canon lenses to be used with af, anyone got experience of these?
How is the af performance on the a7 and how has it improved through the ranges? Also focus to shot time. I currently use a 7dmk2 and an eos m and also we have a Panasonic g7. I fancy something smaller and higher quality.
Oh and also these adapters that allow canon lenses to be used with af, anyone got experience of these?
- Messages
- 2,405
- Name
- owen
- Edit My Images
- No
I use canon Metabones iv .... As long as you aren't expecting 7dmk2 levels of af with the adpter it's perfect.... For portraits etc spot on not for sports or wildlife imho though.... Love my a7r2 etc the dr compared to canon is remarkable I can only speak for the mk2 bodies though
- Messages
- 7,597
- Name
- Riz
- Edit My Images
- No
All the photos in my Airshow Flickr collection were shot on the Sony A7 with 70-200mm f4. No problems at all focusing & tracking.
https://flickr.com/photos/39891775@N05/sets/72157645949808315
Kind regards,
Rizvan
:sleep:
