- Messages
- 2,249
- Edit My Images
- No
lol just realized i cant post there anymore. I guess many reported me there. o well.You unlucky bunch are stuck with me here then
Wait, reporting actually works? *furiously clicking button*
lol just realized i cant post there anymore. I guess many reported me there. o well.You unlucky bunch are stuck with me here then
Hackney Marshes?
it looks like the problem i'm having with hockey goals - it's half a photo
Where did the ball come from? I appreciate the other players are another match - but it just looks like they took a shot 10 minutes ago and walked away and the keeper has just got around to saving it..
So I have decided to take a a couple more lenses than I originally planned ....
Sony A7 III
Sony Zeiss 35mm f2.8
Sony Zeiss 55mm f1.8
Sony 16-35mm f2.8 GM
Sony 85mm f1.4 GM
Why?
16-35 on the camera and the 55 in your pocket would seem more sensible for a holiday.
Why?
16-35 on the camera and the 55 in your pocket would seem more sensible for a holiday.
Life sure is toughI won’t get my Sony FE 24mm f1.4 GM for another 2 weeks
Show me a manipulated raw file from a Sony that compares with a Canon ,That’s the bit that tends to make me smile when colour is mentioned.
Show me a manipulated raw file from a Sony that compares with a Canon ,
I know.... I will take them and decide what to keep with me on the day.
Got a Yacht party which will hopefully present some good portrait opportunities
thats pretty good,can you do the same with lanscapes.
what I meant kris was even Raw files that are altered can not necassarily look like for like.i see it more in foliage type shots generally though.Not sure i follow?
Show me a manipulated raw file from a Sony that compares with a Canon ,
Actually half of photography is about post processing. Even from the film days.come on man, theres nothing better than sitting in from of the computer tweaking tones. thats what photography is all about isn't it?
im not disputing that,just saying to get a similar colour cast etc to a canon on a lanscapy type photo could take some doing,thats assuming one wanted to of course.
Have decided to leave the wide angle zoom until the new year.
Gave into temptation and have placed an order for the 24mm G.M
And this just arrived at the door.
SONY 55MM
Show me a manipulated raw file from a Sony that compares with a Canon ,
You’re always banging this drum and it baffles me.
I’ve seen people switch from Nikon and Canon and their stuff still looks like their stuff.
It’s a bizarre hill to die on.
Body is due tomorrow and I'll have one of those by the end of the week too.
You’re always banging this drum and it baffles me.
I’ve seen people switch from Nikon and Canon and their stuff still looks like their stuff.
It’s a bizarre hill to die on.
Surely with enough tweaking all brands can be made the same (from RAW) as any other brand.Show me a manipulated raw file from a Sony that compares with a Canon ,
Surely with enough tweaking all brands can be made the same (from RAW) as any other brand.
Heck even Panasonics can do skin tones with enough work!!
You will love it.
It’s so light weight. It absolutely isn’t as good a lens as the Sigma Art 50 but it’s ideal for what I want it for though.
This is the charger I use
https://www.amazon.co.uk/LCD-Display-Dual-Channel-Battery-Charger-NP-FZ100/dp/B07BL1WMGN/
In that case i’ll switch instruments.probably played out by now. And yes I think It’s run it’s course especially as it was a bit of a wind up.You’re always banging this drum and it baffles me.
I’ve seen people switch from Nikon and Canon and their stuff still looks like their stuff.
It’s a bizarre hill to die on.