LongLensPhotography
Th..th..that's all folks!
- Messages
- 17,728
- Name
- LongLensPhotography
- Edit My Images
- No
If we presumed optical quality is equally satisfactory*20-70mm is the smallest of the bunch which is nice. I think my favourite is still the 24-105mm overall but it's the largest of the three.
20-70mm is more useful range for general travel and landscape work as a single lens option
and 24-105 range is probably a little more geared towards lifestyle and portrait, but there is a good bit of overlap, and I expect 105mm end to perform least well.
* - now that is a very big IF
If you have a bunch of primes, you may not need a 2.8 zoom. If you don't then probably a good idea... GM2 will be also better optically.
no it doesn't. But macro aren't anywhere near the most expensive of the lot, and even older versions are very good so a very minor issue.But the 70-200mm removes the need for owning a separate macro lens