SONY A7ii with the 55mm Prime. So what fuji can do that speed
Let say I have been able to shoot with the sony at 1 secs but that the slowest I go most of time just a bit faster.. SO what yours if you can help as I like to know how well the OIS are.. Mind you the primes dont have OIS
I shot a -1 once it...I can't believe it, my 2000th post on TP and I'm spunking it on replying to @rookies
What does it matter, even if I got a crisp 1 second shot on the Fuji, or any camera, I could not do it reliably, and I suspect that you can't either, unless you lock all your joints like a robot with the brakes on.
It's a pretty stupid question, and really if that's your deciding factor on whether to change to Fuji or not, I'd suggest that you stay with Sony because it's obviously perfect for your shooting needs.
Why shoot at 1 second without a tripod?? Or why not increase the iSO
I can't believe it, my 2000th post on TP and I'm spunking it on replying to @rookies
What does it matter, even if I got a crisp 1 second shot on the Fuji, or any camera, I could not do it reliably, and I suspect that you can't either, unless you lock all your joints like a robot with the brakes on.
It's a pretty stupid question, and really if that's your deciding factor on whether to change to Fuji or not, I'd suggest that you stay with Sony because it's obviously perfect for your shooting needs.
Why shoot at 1 second without a tripod?? Or why not increase the iSO
Link to your Flickr pleaseLet say I can
Sorry I spoken!!!
Thank you pal will pick one of those up tarJust got one of those here, in black. Very solid little pod, love the one touch adjustment, holds the XT-1 with the 55-200 at all angles no bother. Bit short, but handy to have in the bag.
I just been to curry and they got a xt10 and the 16-50mm lens. Had a quick play around with the camera. My verdicts are:
- Abit too small for me so xt1 is defo my choice.
- EVF is so good and i like it. Use EVF from lumix m43 before and i don't like it at all
- build quality is fantastic
- image quality is fantastic too
- i like iso knob ......
- don't like the feel of the 16-50 but it goes well with the xt10 tho.
I'm looking forward to see the xt1 tomorrow.
Cant have small hands if you own a tank of a D3I went and tried both today and preferred the xt10 ... lol...... personal preference I do have small hands though as well lol
Do anyone use a portable mini tripods with there camera with a prime on as like a small one on outing than taking the big mongrotto out
No one telling you to read the thread that your choice pal... I am only trying to gather information it a open forum.. If I p*** people off then I am sorry..I sometimes read this thread and punch myself for it.
Didn't say it was you.No one telling you to read the thread that your choice pal... I am only trying to gather information it a open forum.. If I p*** people off then I am sorry..
I just been to curry and they got a xt10 and the 16-50mm lens. Had a quick play around with the camera. My verdicts are:
- Abit too small for me so xt1 is defo my choice.
SONY A7ii with the 55mm Prime. So what fuji can do that speed
Didn't say it was you.
Totally. My version of "sharp" is somewhere between Turner and Constable. Then again, my handholding is Gene Wilder in Blazing Saddles . So on balance I generally go for the tripod if I'm below about 1/15 with OIS. Others can no doubt do better.Depends how steady the photographer is, how they are stood etc. Also depends on your definition of sharp. Personally I'd rather use a tripod than go that slow handheld.
Depends how steady the photographer is, how they are stood etc. Also depends on your definition of sharp. Personally I'd rather use a tripod than go that slow handheld.
Prime all day long!Im pulling my hair out trying to decide on what lens i want. Stuck between the 56mm 1.2 and the 16-55mm F2.8
Both completely different lenses i know. I shoot weddings and would love to incorporate the fuji a bit more. I already have the 35mm F2.0
I dont suppose anyone has any comparison shots of the 56mm against the 16-55 at the 55mm end do they?
If i went for the 16-55mm i would probably sell the 35mm.
If you like the EVF on the XT10 you'll love the one on the XT1. Not only is it larger it seems an all over better image (at least the ones I tried side by side).I just been to curry and they got a xt10 and the 16-50mm lens. Had a quick play around with the camera. My verdicts are:
- Abit too small for me so xt1 is defo my choice.
- EVF is so good and i like it. Use EVF from lumix m43 before and i don't like it at all
- build quality is fantastic
- image quality is fantastic too
- i like iso knob ......
- don't like the feel of the 16-50 but it goes well with the xt10 tho.
I'm looking forward to see the xt1 tomorrow.
If you like the EVF on the XT10 you'll love the one on the XT1. Not only is it larger it seems an all over better image (at least the ones I tried side by side).
I think it's only better in terms of reduced lag, in terms of clarity and sharpness it's the same isn't it? 0.77 magnification with 2.36m dots.And the one on xt2 meant be better still
I think it's only better in terms of reduced lag, in terms of clarity and sharpness it's the same isn't it? 0.77 magnification with 2.36m dots.
Been messing about with an adapted Sigma 150mm macro. not the easiest lens to use manually hand-held on the XT-1, and tricky focussing. insanely shallow DOF you can get with it. A lot of practice needed with this set up. But I do love the contrast this lens delivers.
The apple was shot using flash and on a mini tripod, it's the only one here non cropped. The others hand held, natural lighting in the garden. Felt like I'd lifted weights after!
Applenana by Enticing Imagery, on Flickr
_DSF0005 by Enticing Imagery, on Flickr
_DSF9994 by Enticing Imagery, on Flickr
_DSF0002 by Enticing Imagery, on Flickr
Nice results, really like the apple. Didn't realise the lens weighs near on a kilo though!
Im pulling my hair out trying to decide on what lens i want. Stuck between the 56mm 1.2 and the 16-55mm F2.8
Both completely different lenses i know. I shoot weddings and would love to incorporate the fuji a bit more. I already have the 35mm F2.0
I dont suppose anyone has any comparison shots of the 56mm against the 16-55 at the 55mm end do they?
If i went for the 16-55mm i would probably sell the 35mm.
Yes.Anyone used the Raynox DCR250?
10℅ quidco cashback at Argos and Currys at the moment, if you can find any Fuji stuff in stock!!
Anyone used the Raynox DCR250?