- Messages
- 13,582
- Name
- Dean
- Edit My Images
- No
After the farce that was Thiago and Fabregas, United are today being linked with Ozil. I'd be over the moon but I really can't see that happening.
I'd be amazed if that happened.
After the farce that was Thiago and Fabregas, United are today being linked with Ozil. I'd be over the moon but I really can't see that happening.
I'd be amazed if that happened.
Same here.
If Rooney goes then at least Kagawa should finally get to play in the position that saw him win Bundesliga Football Player of the Year with Dortmund. Ozil would kind of hinder that. I'd also like to see more of Januzaj.
Given our continued weak central midfield I think Fellaini would be a decent option even if he's not that 'marquee' sighning some people seem to crave.
but you still need more creativity.
What we really need is a carbon copy of Scholes.
Zaha, Nani, Young, Valencia, Kagawa have all been wide options.
Centrally we have Carrick who pretty much runs our team.
If Carrick gets an injury we have Fletcher (who knows what will happen with him) Anderson (who is never fit) Giggs (cough) Cleverley (still not convinced) Jones (make do midfielder) and Powell (is he ready)
Januzaj is a very creative player but it remains to be seen what we're going to do with him.
Just like we need a Fowler and Barnes.
Yep, replacing legends is very hard - even Fergie was struggling to do that. I'm interested to see how Moyes copes.
Transfer news breaking Scott Parker has signed for qpr
are you serious? Oh, Harry!Transfer news breaking Scott Parker has signed for qpr
My Tartan Army mates are sending me phone pics of their 'invasion' LOL



Transfer news breaking Scott Parker has signed for qpr
Been rumoured for a while, lots on the twitterspehere apparently, nothing confirmed that I can see.
I'm quite looking forward to the end of the transfer window![]()
Surely not consider Huddlestone and Livermore have just left spurs?
Who knows, I'd be surprised, but transfer wise at QPR nothing will really surprise me any more. From his point of view, not sure why he would drop to the championship, other than £££. Staying in London I suppose, but Fulham, Palace, West Ham etc would surely be better options..
I mean, no offence to Lambert, but how is giving a 31 year old a debut supposed to help us look to the World cup?
Shocking selection
True, surprised you let Remy go. Although I gather he would probably want a move away. He looked dangerous when you signed him. Just shame he seemed to pick up a couple of knocks.
Welbeck.... MOM... really???
Cant understand why we continue to play Hart? Yes, he made a big error but is undisputed no.1, so why not play Ruddy and give him experience? What happens if Hart is sent off, injured, or even has a big loss of form? Crazy!
Welbeck.... MOM... really???
Cant understand why we continue to play Hart? Yes, he made a big error but is undisputed no.1, so why not play Ruddy and give him experience? What happens if Hart is sent off, injured, or even has a big loss of form? Crazy!
Shocking debut![]()
Never said there was anything wrong with him, its debuting a 31 year old I have an issue with.
Maybe we could have used one of those involved in the 6-0 last night, or is that a bit too much like forward thinking?

What's your issue with 31
2016 / 2018 is a different thing altogether but I'm not so sure 'forward thinking' is the name of the game for a World Cup that's just around the corner.
Lambert scores a good variety of goals and I get the impression he'd give evrything to get into an England World Cup squad. As I said the other day, if he has another good season then he's a serious option so it makes sense to be giving him match time.

So if we can agree that Lambert isn't going to win the world cup for us, then what possible use can there be in using him?
So if we can agree that Lambert isn't going to win the world cup for us, then what possible use can there be in using him?
I really don't have anything personal against him, but do you really think that the likes of Spain and Germany would be tinking the same way as you are? If he was the final icing on the cake of a team that could mount a serious challenge for the trophy then his age wouldn't be an issue, but he's not. At best he's an impact substitute in a team that might be good enough to get to the quarters if the draw goes in our favour.
I honestly can't see the benefit in taking him, and its attitudes like this that are one of the reasons we are no longer considered a threat by the established top nations
A 31 year old substitute newcomer is completely the wrong player to be on the plane.