Raymond Lin
I am Groot
- Messages
- 10,563
- Name
- Raymond
- Edit My Images
- No
Canon 135L 2.0.
Is this not one of Canon’s best but least known lenses? Every forum I’ve been to, the people who has it, rave about it, they often say it’s their best lens in their bag. Yet during normal lens discussions, it hardly ever comes up. Why is that? Is it because a lot of amateur does mostly Landscapes? The 135L is one of Canon’s “cheaper/cheapest” L-glass, just above the 70-400 F/4. It has super quick Auto Focus, pin sharp WIDE open at F/2.0 and gives a smoooooth creamy bokeh. There are no other lens that compare to this in the lens line up except the 85mm 1.2 but that costs twice as much at around £1.5k. Considering the price and what you get with the 135L, this lens is something of a bargain IMO.
Or…is it too a specialist lens to warrant the purchase for most people?
Is this not one of Canon’s best but least known lenses? Every forum I’ve been to, the people who has it, rave about it, they often say it’s their best lens in their bag. Yet during normal lens discussions, it hardly ever comes up. Why is that? Is it because a lot of amateur does mostly Landscapes? The 135L is one of Canon’s “cheaper/cheapest” L-glass, just above the 70-400 F/4. It has super quick Auto Focus, pin sharp WIDE open at F/2.0 and gives a smoooooth creamy bokeh. There are no other lens that compare to this in the lens line up except the 85mm 1.2 but that costs twice as much at around £1.5k. Considering the price and what you get with the 135L, this lens is something of a bargain IMO.
Or…is it too a specialist lens to warrant the purchase for most people?