The Rolex Sweep

Messages
2,104
Edit My Images
Yes
Something a bit different that I haven't seen here but on some other forums. Tried to capture the sweeping second hand of my Rolex over a 1s exposure, bit hit n miss I think just playing with ISO and aperture settings.

1st image: flash fired still of the dial (yes should've cleaned the crystal a bit beforehand!)

3777149376_ac1db445ca.jpg


2nd image: 1s sweep of the seconds hand

3777151566_37796c50b4.jpg


3rd image: capturing the other end of the seconds hand

3776344219_04d9642299_b.jpg


4th image: probably my least favourite exposure but tried a rear curtain sync flash 1s exposure

3776348305_7056f79e60.jpg


c&c welcome especially any tips for getting that seconds hand crisp - wasn't sure what would help - change aperture or increase/decrease the iso
 
Remember that even genuine Rolex second hands don't actually sweep, they still "tick" but at the rate (in the case of the 3135 movement in the Submariner) at 480 bpm, or 8 ticks per second.
 
Remember that even genuine Rolex second hands don't actually sweep, they still "tick" but at the rate (in the case of the 3135 movement in the Submariner) at 480 bpm, or 8 ticks per second.

yes thats correct - i count 8 on the 3rd pic there :woot:, but its made to look like a continuous sweep as opposed to a quartz movement which would just tick every second.
 
Another WIS in the house?? 8s exposure on my P&S clearly showing this is a quartz and not a mechanical movement:

3665083060_9d8cc94953.jpg


Edit: The best way to capture faster analogue movements is to light paint using a strobe firing at fixed interval (1s), this will create a sweep effect with wider "tick" seperation.

Carl
 
Last edited:
Back
Top