Theory - three lenses

not fussed for some reason over sigma and got a canon not a nikon so pretty much none ;) sorry for the pun :D
 
Doesn't it depend what you want to take photos of? Or am I missing something somewhere?
 
It depends what you need it for, but if you just want to blow the money for a good lens (a few of us do that), then:

1. Bigma - good reach, rubbish IQ. Rubbish.
2. 150mm - well regarded, sharp macro (never tried one). Maybe Nikon 105mm VR instead?
3. 30mm. Mixed feelings - fast and sharp in the centre, really poor corners. OK for gigs.

You may also consider Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4 and so on. 200mm f4 (non-VR I assume) will cause lots of pain and frustration due to shake, and f/4 and fixed length. 200mm f/2.8 L USM is no joy for that reason, let alone f/4 MF. 50mm f/1.2 has rave reviews, but how good are you at MF in poor light with hair thin DOF, and your viefinder is only optimised for f2.8.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top