- Messages
- 21,132
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Not going to rush into a decision, but I am starting to think about changing my lens lineup.
Firstly, I have the Nikon 24-70 which is a keeper - use this for paid work and as an everyday out and about lens. I also have a 50mm 1.4 which again I use a lot, with the kids and also on paid work. I also have a Nikon 70-200VR and just acquired a 85mm 1.8 which I really did like when used for the 1st time last weekend. Am starting to think about selling the 70-200 and my 85mm and maybe getting the 1.4 85mm and a 70-300VR.
I have rarely used the 70-200 work, but only when outdoor, and often the 85mm would be fine for that I guess. I sometimes will use it with the kids if we go to beach or somewhere where i need length, as well as a couple of airshows a year - so basically not too much but I am loath to lose it as it is a very good lens! I did have the 70-300 before and its a decent lens. At airshows I like prop planes so would rarely shoot below f8 anyway to get prop blur and 300mm would be a better length.
Anyone else chopped in their Nikon 70-200 for something else and regretted it or thought it was a good decision. In an ideal world I would keep it and get a 1.4 but need to be practical.
Firstly, I have the Nikon 24-70 which is a keeper - use this for paid work and as an everyday out and about lens. I also have a 50mm 1.4 which again I use a lot, with the kids and also on paid work. I also have a Nikon 70-200VR and just acquired a 85mm 1.8 which I really did like when used for the 1st time last weekend. Am starting to think about selling the 70-200 and my 85mm and maybe getting the 1.4 85mm and a 70-300VR.
I have rarely used the 70-200 work, but only when outdoor, and often the 85mm would be fine for that I guess. I sometimes will use it with the kids if we go to beach or somewhere where i need length, as well as a couple of airshows a year - so basically not too much but I am loath to lose it as it is a very good lens! I did have the 70-300 before and its a decent lens. At airshows I like prop planes so would rarely shoot below f8 anyway to get prop blur and 300mm would be a better length.
Anyone else chopped in their Nikon 70-200 for something else and regretted it or thought it was a good decision. In an ideal world I would keep it and get a 1.4 but need to be practical.