wow, no wonder theres so many accidents on the road when people never seem to hold the wheel properly :/

Hey Chrisc - I have done some timelapse with my Canon 350D and beware it uses A LOT of shotsI messed about with timelapse for about a week and took about 10,000 shots
I stuck some of my stuff on Youtube:
[YOUTUBE]y018OmUJG0Y[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]xetKL1pqI_I[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]QZnqQtzn0d8[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]mYKpwZzSL0E[/YOUTUBE]
The gave up in the end and decided it was easier to use a video camera for relatively short stuff. I will try again with some longer timelapse sometime, something covering 12 hours or something.
Timelapse from video camera:
[YOUTUBE]ELu4z17k8TI[/YOUTUBE]
Just a cheap tripod wedged between seats or in footwells etc EOS_Kam - it isnt perfect, but it just about holds up.
How would I stitch them together at the end to make a movie?
Most movie making software allow you to add pictures. I used to use Ulead when on a PC and i just added picture after picture and just reduced the display time.
Thanks, but would that work with best part of 6,000 photos?
Thanks, but would that work with best part of 6,000 photos?
I gave this a go a few months ago. I used the software that comes with the 40D and just connected it up to my mac. If you wana watch it its here.
The problem is I always shoot in RAW and large JPEG. 6,000 shots at 12Mb + 8 Mb each means 120Gb![]()
How many shots do you need to take a second and overall to make this work?
OoOoOoOoh interesting
So you didn't change the exposure?
Am I mad to think about doing it over four days though?
The problem is I always shoot in RAW and large JPEG. 6,000 shots at 12Mb + 8 Mb each means 120Gb
Any free movie software out there?
OoOoOoOoh interesting
So you didn't change the exposure?
Am I mad to think about doing it over four days though?
How many shots do you need to take a second and overall to make this work?