TP visitor stats

[Les McLean]

According to statbrain TP holds up pretty well against like minded websites/forums with 9471 visits per day.

http://www.statbrain.com/www.talkphotography.co.uk/

This compares with amateur photographer with 4452 visits per day.

http://www.statbrain.com/www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/

Photoblink has 6713

http://www.statbrain.com/www.photoblink.com/

A minority forum like inspiring photography has 601

http://www.statbrain.com/www.inspiring-photography.com/

POTN has more- 30,057 but as it's more 'international' than TP it's probably expected .

http://www.statbrain.com/www.photography-on-the.net/

Of course it's totally dwarfed by flickr with 7,269,842 visitors per day.

http://www.statbrain.com/www.flickr.com/

And my own site managed a respectable 586 visits per day

http://www.statbrain.com/www.lesmclean.co.uk/

I am not making any claims about the reliability or validity of the above figures, and statbrain themselves provide this statement on the accuracy of the data 'It is not an exact science, but it does give you a very good picture of how many visits a website has'

So take it or leave it, but compared to similar kind of sites/forums, TP more than holds it's own in the popularity stakes.

 

[purpleclouds]

Well, I tried it on my site and it gave a number which was totally wrong....so I'm not sure how much trust to hold in these results!

 

[Byker28i]

Interesting - thanks.

One of the nice things about TP is it's predominantly British, and so seems to have more relevance to me/my photography.

 

[Les McLean]

Well, I tried it on my site and it gave a number which was totally wrong....so I'm not sure how much trust to hold in these results!

Mine was almost the same as my own web stats-but as I mentioned-take it or leave it, but please lets not let it degenerate into a pointless discussion about the accuracy of the data. :shake:

 

[purpleclouds]

Mine was almost the same as my own web stats-but as I mentioned-take it or leave it, but please lets not let it degenerate into a pointless discussion about the accuracy of the data. :shake:

Well, what I'm trying to say is - that if it is wrong, then the comparisons between other websites would be pointless...that's all It was saying over 6x higher for my daily views which is beyond accuracy

Apparently it is pageviews a day, and 9000 seems a bit low?

But...as the figures stand, I am quite impressed!

 

[Les McLean]

Well, what I'm trying to say is - that if it is wrong, then the comparisons between other websites would be pointless...that's all It was saying over 6x higher for my daily views which is beyond accuracy

Apparently it is pageviews a day, and 9000 seems a bit low?

But...as the figures stand, I am quite impressed!

Thanks

As I mentioned, mine is not far out, the April daily average for my site (directly from the hosting ISP) is 649 compared to 586 from statbrain